Glossing Vergil and Pagan Learning in the Carolingian Age

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
121 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Though a conventional diatribe against secular studies persisted in the early medieval period, avid glossing of pagan texts demonstrates that early medieval commentators had few qualms about reading them and that crucially the patristic bias against classical learning had been rendered obsolete. This paper focuses on a single ninth-century Vergil manuscript, Oxford, Bodleian Library, Auct. F. 2. 8, and its rich scholarly apparatus as an instance of the Carolingian penchant for classical antiquity. It furnishes evidence for a strong endorsement of pagan learning and shows that it was not only Vergil’s style but also his content that engaged Christian readers. It thus challenges the older view of confrontation between pagan and Christian cultures, already undermined by Harald Hagendahl in his reassessment of Jerome’s response to the classics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-165
Number of pages34
JournalSpeculum
Volume93
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

antiquity
learning
trend
evidence
Carolingian
Virgil
Pagans
Early Medieval Period
Classical Studies
Classical Antiquity
Christian Culture
Bodleian Library
Conventional
Reader
Diatribe
Penchant
Manuscripts
9th Century
Commentators
Confrontation

Cite this

@article{73308b085f9d413c8ded0dcdbaff2f95,
title = "Glossing Vergil and Pagan Learning in the Carolingian Age",
abstract = "Though a conventional diatribe against secular studies persisted in the early medieval period, avid glossing of pagan texts demonstrates that early medieval commentators had few qualms about reading them and that crucially the patristic bias against classical learning had been rendered obsolete. This paper focuses on a single ninth-century Vergil manuscript, Oxford, Bodleian Library, Auct. F. 2. 8, and its rich scholarly apparatus as an instance of the Carolingian penchant for classical antiquity. It furnishes evidence for a strong endorsement of pagan learning and shows that it was not only Vergil’s style but also his content that engaged Christian readers. It thus challenges the older view of confrontation between pagan and Christian cultures, already undermined by Harald Hagendahl in his reassessment of Jerome’s response to the classics.",
author = "Sinead O'Sullivan",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "132--165",
journal = "Speculum",
issn = "0038-7134",
publisher = "Medieval Academy of America",
number = "1",

}

Glossing Vergil and Pagan Learning in the Carolingian Age. / O'Sullivan, Sinead.

In: Speculum, Vol. 93, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 132-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Glossing Vergil and Pagan Learning in the Carolingian Age

AU - O'Sullivan, Sinead

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Though a conventional diatribe against secular studies persisted in the early medieval period, avid glossing of pagan texts demonstrates that early medieval commentators had few qualms about reading them and that crucially the patristic bias against classical learning had been rendered obsolete. This paper focuses on a single ninth-century Vergil manuscript, Oxford, Bodleian Library, Auct. F. 2. 8, and its rich scholarly apparatus as an instance of the Carolingian penchant for classical antiquity. It furnishes evidence for a strong endorsement of pagan learning and shows that it was not only Vergil’s style but also his content that engaged Christian readers. It thus challenges the older view of confrontation between pagan and Christian cultures, already undermined by Harald Hagendahl in his reassessment of Jerome’s response to the classics.

AB - Though a conventional diatribe against secular studies persisted in the early medieval period, avid glossing of pagan texts demonstrates that early medieval commentators had few qualms about reading them and that crucially the patristic bias against classical learning had been rendered obsolete. This paper focuses on a single ninth-century Vergil manuscript, Oxford, Bodleian Library, Auct. F. 2. 8, and its rich scholarly apparatus as an instance of the Carolingian penchant for classical antiquity. It furnishes evidence for a strong endorsement of pagan learning and shows that it was not only Vergil’s style but also his content that engaged Christian readers. It thus challenges the older view of confrontation between pagan and Christian cultures, already undermined by Harald Hagendahl in his reassessment of Jerome’s response to the classics.

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 132

EP - 165

JO - Speculum

JF - Speculum

SN - 0038-7134

IS - 1

ER -