Good Laboratory Practice for optimization research

Graham Kendall, Ruibin Bai, Jacek Blazewicz, Patrick De Causmaecker, Michel Gendreau, Robert John, Jiawei Li, Barry McCollum, Erwin Pesch, Rong Qu, Nasser Sabar, Greet Vanden Berghe, Angelina Yee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Good Laboratory Practice has been a part of non-clinical research for over 40 years. Optimization Research, despite having many papers discussing standards being published over the same period of time, has yet to embrace standards that underpin its research. In this paper we argue the need to adopt standards in optimization research. Building on previous papers, many of which have suggested that the optimization research community should adopt certain standards, we suggest a concrete set of recommendations that the community should adopt. We also discuss how the proposals in this paper could be progressed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)676-689
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Operational Research Society
Volume67
Issue number4
Early online date21 Oct 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2016

Keywords

  • Optimisation
  • Operations Research
  • reproducibility

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Good Laboratory Practice for optimization research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kendall, G., Bai, R., Blazewicz, J., De Causmaecker, P., Gendreau, M., John, R., Li, J., McCollum, B., Pesch, E., Qu, R., Sabar, N., Vanden Berghe, G., & Yee, A. (2016). Good Laboratory Practice for optimization research. Journal of Operational Research Society, 67(4), 676-689. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.77