Harmful transgressions qua moral transgressions: A deflationary view

Paulo Sousa, Jared Piazza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)


One important issue in moral psychology concerns the proper characterization of the folk understanding of the relationship between harmful transgressions and moral transgressions. Psychologist Elliot Turiel and associates have claimed with a broad range of supporting evidence that harmful transgressions are understood as transgressions that are authority independent and general in scope, which, according to them, characterizes these transgressions as moral transgressions. Recently, many researchers questioned the position advocated by the Turiel tradition with some new evidence. We entered this debate proposing an original, deflationary view in which perceptions of basic-rights violation and injustice are fundamental for the folk understanding of harmful transgressions as moral transgressions in Turiel’s sense. In this article, we elaborate and refine our deflationary view, while reviewing the debate, addressing various criticisms raised against our perspective, showing how our perspective explains the existent evidence, and suggesting new lines of inquiry.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-128
Number of pages31
JournalThinking & Reasoning
Issue number1
Early online date17 Sep 2013
Publication statusPublished - 2014


  • harm; moral transgression; punishment; moral psychology; social cognition


Dive into the research topics of 'Harmful transgressions qua moral transgressions: A deflationary view'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this