Headsprout Early Reading for Specific Literacy Difficulty: A Comparison Study

Catherine Storey, Claire McDowell, Julian Leslie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of the Headsprout© Early Reading (HER) program with SENCO-delivered supplementary literacy instruction. Participants were primary school children (aged 6–9) in receipt of free school meals and supplementary literacy instruction. Data were collected within their school setting. The treatment group received HER intervention, while the treatment as usual (TAU) group received SENCO-delivered intervention, inclusive of guided reading, paper-based phonics training and word recognition tasks. It was hypothesized that children in the HER intervention group would significantly outperform those in the TAU group on measures of word/non-word recognition and sentence reading over a 7-month period. Thirty-two pupils with specific literacy difficulty were randomized to either HER (n = 17) or TAU (n = 15). Literacy skills were assessed using the Phonics and Early Reading Assessment pre- and post-intervention. ANOVA and t test analysis found that HER made significantly greater gains on measures of word/non-word recognition [t(30) = 7.55, p < 0.001], sentence reading [t(30) = 3.33, p < 0.05] and sight words [t(30) = 4.23, p < 0.001] than the TAU group. This study is the first to demonstrate stronger outcomes for children receiving computer-aided instruction over SENCO-delivered literacy instruction in a Northern Irish School.
LanguageEnglish
JournalJournal of Behavioral Education
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Reading
literacy
instruction
Group
Voice Training
computer-aided instruction
school
Therapeutics
Literacy
meals
Pupil
schoolchild
Meals
primary school
pupil
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • Reading Instruction, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Headsprout, Emergent Literacy, Literacy Difficulty

Cite this

@article{16346be4267e47bea29aa061ccd33173,
title = "Headsprout Early Reading for Specific Literacy Difficulty: A Comparison Study",
abstract = "This study compared the efficacy of the Headsprout{\circledC} Early Reading (HER) program with SENCO-delivered supplementary literacy instruction. Participants were primary school children (aged 6–9) in receipt of free school meals and supplementary literacy instruction. Data were collected within their school setting. The treatment group received HER intervention, while the treatment as usual (TAU) group received SENCO-delivered intervention, inclusive of guided reading, paper-based phonics training and word recognition tasks. It was hypothesized that children in the HER intervention group would significantly outperform those in the TAU group on measures of word/non-word recognition and sentence reading over a 7-month period. Thirty-two pupils with specific literacy difficulty were randomized to either HER (n = 17) or TAU (n = 15). Literacy skills were assessed using the Phonics and Early Reading Assessment pre- and post-intervention. ANOVA and t test analysis found that HER made significantly greater gains on measures of word/non-word recognition [t(30) = 7.55, p < 0.001], sentence reading [t(30) = 3.33, p < 0.05] and sight words [t(30) = 4.23, p < 0.001] than the TAU group. This study is the first to demonstrate stronger outcomes for children receiving computer-aided instruction over SENCO-delivered literacy instruction in a Northern Irish School.",
keywords = "Reading Instruction, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Headsprout, Emergent Literacy, Literacy Difficulty",
author = "Catherine Storey and Claire McDowell and Julian Leslie",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1007/s10864-019-09336-7",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Education",
issn = "1053-0819",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

Headsprout Early Reading for Specific Literacy Difficulty: A Comparison Study. / Storey, Catherine; McDowell, Claire ; Leslie , Julian .

In: Journal of Behavioral Education , 18.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Headsprout Early Reading for Specific Literacy Difficulty: A Comparison Study

AU - Storey, Catherine

AU - McDowell, Claire

AU - Leslie , Julian

PY - 2019/6/18

Y1 - 2019/6/18

N2 - This study compared the efficacy of the Headsprout© Early Reading (HER) program with SENCO-delivered supplementary literacy instruction. Participants were primary school children (aged 6–9) in receipt of free school meals and supplementary literacy instruction. Data were collected within their school setting. The treatment group received HER intervention, while the treatment as usual (TAU) group received SENCO-delivered intervention, inclusive of guided reading, paper-based phonics training and word recognition tasks. It was hypothesized that children in the HER intervention group would significantly outperform those in the TAU group on measures of word/non-word recognition and sentence reading over a 7-month period. Thirty-two pupils with specific literacy difficulty were randomized to either HER (n = 17) or TAU (n = 15). Literacy skills were assessed using the Phonics and Early Reading Assessment pre- and post-intervention. ANOVA and t test analysis found that HER made significantly greater gains on measures of word/non-word recognition [t(30) = 7.55, p < 0.001], sentence reading [t(30) = 3.33, p < 0.05] and sight words [t(30) = 4.23, p < 0.001] than the TAU group. This study is the first to demonstrate stronger outcomes for children receiving computer-aided instruction over SENCO-delivered literacy instruction in a Northern Irish School.

AB - This study compared the efficacy of the Headsprout© Early Reading (HER) program with SENCO-delivered supplementary literacy instruction. Participants were primary school children (aged 6–9) in receipt of free school meals and supplementary literacy instruction. Data were collected within their school setting. The treatment group received HER intervention, while the treatment as usual (TAU) group received SENCO-delivered intervention, inclusive of guided reading, paper-based phonics training and word recognition tasks. It was hypothesized that children in the HER intervention group would significantly outperform those in the TAU group on measures of word/non-word recognition and sentence reading over a 7-month period. Thirty-two pupils with specific literacy difficulty were randomized to either HER (n = 17) or TAU (n = 15). Literacy skills were assessed using the Phonics and Early Reading Assessment pre- and post-intervention. ANOVA and t test analysis found that HER made significantly greater gains on measures of word/non-word recognition [t(30) = 7.55, p < 0.001], sentence reading [t(30) = 3.33, p < 0.05] and sight words [t(30) = 4.23, p < 0.001] than the TAU group. This study is the first to demonstrate stronger outcomes for children receiving computer-aided instruction over SENCO-delivered literacy instruction in a Northern Irish School.

KW - Reading Instruction, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Headsprout, Emergent Literacy, Literacy Difficulty

U2 - 10.1007/s10864-019-09336-7

DO - 10.1007/s10864-019-09336-7

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Behavioral Education

T2 - Journal of Behavioral Education

JF - Journal of Behavioral Education

SN - 1053-0819

ER -