Hierarchy as a barrier to advancement for women in academic medicine

P. Conrad, P. Carr, S. Knight, M.R. Renfrew, M.B. Dunn, L. Pololi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Research on barriers to professional advancement for women in academic medicine has not adequately considered the role of environmental factors and how the structure of organizations affects professional advancement and work experiences. This article examines the impact of the hierarchy, including both the organization's hierarchical structure and professionals' perceptions of this structure, in medical school organization on faculty members' experience and advancement in academic medicine. Methods: As part of an inductive qualitative study of faculty in five disparate U.S. medical schools, we interviewed 96 medical faculty at different career stages and in diverse specialties, using in-depth semistructured interviews, about their perceptions about and experiences in academic medicine. Data were coded and analysis was conducted in the grounded theory tradition. Results: Our respondents saw the hierarchy of chairs, based on the indeterminate tenure of department chairs, as a central characteristic of the structure of academic medicine. Many faculty saw this hierarchy as affecting inclusion, reducing transparency in decision making, and impeding advancement. Indeterminate chair terms lessen turnover and may create a bottleneck for advancement. Both men and women faculty perceived this hierarchy, but women saw it as more consequential. Conclusions: The hierarchical structure of academic medicine has a significant impact on faculty work experiences, including advancement, especially for women. We suggest that medical schools consider alternative models of leadership and managerial styles, including fixed terms for chairs with a greater emphasis on inclusion. This is a structural reform that could increase opportunities for advancement especially for women in academic medicine.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)799-805
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Women's Health
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Medicine
Medical Schools
Organizations
Medical Faculties
Decision Making
Interviews
Research

Bibliographical note

MEDLINE® is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.

Cite this

Conrad, P., Carr, P., Knight, S., Renfrew, M. R., Dunn, M. B., & Pololi, L. (2010). Hierarchy as a barrier to advancement for women in academic medicine. International Journal of Women's Health, 19(4), 799-805. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1591
Conrad, P. ; Carr, P. ; Knight, S. ; Renfrew, M.R. ; Dunn, M.B. ; Pololi, L. / Hierarchy as a barrier to advancement for women in academic medicine. In: International Journal of Women's Health. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 799-805.
@article{1642e36f4ea34af8a2d2cbf1d46e3dee,
title = "Hierarchy as a barrier to advancement for women in academic medicine",
abstract = "Background: Research on barriers to professional advancement for women in academic medicine has not adequately considered the role of environmental factors and how the structure of organizations affects professional advancement and work experiences. This article examines the impact of the hierarchy, including both the organization's hierarchical structure and professionals' perceptions of this structure, in medical school organization on faculty members' experience and advancement in academic medicine. Methods: As part of an inductive qualitative study of faculty in five disparate U.S. medical schools, we interviewed 96 medical faculty at different career stages and in diverse specialties, using in-depth semistructured interviews, about their perceptions about and experiences in academic medicine. Data were coded and analysis was conducted in the grounded theory tradition. Results: Our respondents saw the hierarchy of chairs, based on the indeterminate tenure of department chairs, as a central characteristic of the structure of academic medicine. Many faculty saw this hierarchy as affecting inclusion, reducing transparency in decision making, and impeding advancement. Indeterminate chair terms lessen turnover and may create a bottleneck for advancement. Both men and women faculty perceived this hierarchy, but women saw it as more consequential. Conclusions: The hierarchical structure of academic medicine has a significant impact on faculty work experiences, including advancement, especially for women. We suggest that medical schools consider alternative models of leadership and managerial styles, including fixed terms for chairs with a greater emphasis on inclusion. This is a structural reform that could increase opportunities for advancement especially for women in academic medicine.",
author = "P. Conrad and P. Carr and S. Knight and M.R. Renfrew and M.B. Dunn and L. Pololi",
note = "MEDLINE{\circledR} is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jwh.2009.1591",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "799--805",
journal = "International Journal of Women's Health",
issn = "1179-1411",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Conrad, P, Carr, P, Knight, S, Renfrew, MR, Dunn, MB & Pololi, L 2010, 'Hierarchy as a barrier to advancement for women in academic medicine', International Journal of Women's Health, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 799-805. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1591

Hierarchy as a barrier to advancement for women in academic medicine. / Conrad, P.; Carr, P.; Knight, S.; Renfrew, M.R.; Dunn, M.B.; Pololi, L.

In: International Journal of Women's Health, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.04.2010, p. 799-805.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hierarchy as a barrier to advancement for women in academic medicine

AU - Conrad, P.

AU - Carr, P.

AU - Knight, S.

AU - Renfrew, M.R.

AU - Dunn, M.B.

AU - Pololi, L.

N1 - MEDLINE® is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - Background: Research on barriers to professional advancement for women in academic medicine has not adequately considered the role of environmental factors and how the structure of organizations affects professional advancement and work experiences. This article examines the impact of the hierarchy, including both the organization's hierarchical structure and professionals' perceptions of this structure, in medical school organization on faculty members' experience and advancement in academic medicine. Methods: As part of an inductive qualitative study of faculty in five disparate U.S. medical schools, we interviewed 96 medical faculty at different career stages and in diverse specialties, using in-depth semistructured interviews, about their perceptions about and experiences in academic medicine. Data were coded and analysis was conducted in the grounded theory tradition. Results: Our respondents saw the hierarchy of chairs, based on the indeterminate tenure of department chairs, as a central characteristic of the structure of academic medicine. Many faculty saw this hierarchy as affecting inclusion, reducing transparency in decision making, and impeding advancement. Indeterminate chair terms lessen turnover and may create a bottleneck for advancement. Both men and women faculty perceived this hierarchy, but women saw it as more consequential. Conclusions: The hierarchical structure of academic medicine has a significant impact on faculty work experiences, including advancement, especially for women. We suggest that medical schools consider alternative models of leadership and managerial styles, including fixed terms for chairs with a greater emphasis on inclusion. This is a structural reform that could increase opportunities for advancement especially for women in academic medicine.

AB - Background: Research on barriers to professional advancement for women in academic medicine has not adequately considered the role of environmental factors and how the structure of organizations affects professional advancement and work experiences. This article examines the impact of the hierarchy, including both the organization's hierarchical structure and professionals' perceptions of this structure, in medical school organization on faculty members' experience and advancement in academic medicine. Methods: As part of an inductive qualitative study of faculty in five disparate U.S. medical schools, we interviewed 96 medical faculty at different career stages and in diverse specialties, using in-depth semistructured interviews, about their perceptions about and experiences in academic medicine. Data were coded and analysis was conducted in the grounded theory tradition. Results: Our respondents saw the hierarchy of chairs, based on the indeterminate tenure of department chairs, as a central characteristic of the structure of academic medicine. Many faculty saw this hierarchy as affecting inclusion, reducing transparency in decision making, and impeding advancement. Indeterminate chair terms lessen turnover and may create a bottleneck for advancement. Both men and women faculty perceived this hierarchy, but women saw it as more consequential. Conclusions: The hierarchical structure of academic medicine has a significant impact on faculty work experiences, including advancement, especially for women. We suggest that medical schools consider alternative models of leadership and managerial styles, including fixed terms for chairs with a greater emphasis on inclusion. This is a structural reform that could increase opportunities for advancement especially for women in academic medicine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=yv4JPVwI&eid=2-s2.0-77951771211&md5=e48fe00541f6152ab18e80bab376773b

U2 - 10.1089/jwh.2009.1591

DO - 10.1089/jwh.2009.1591

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77951771211

VL - 19

SP - 799

EP - 805

JO - International Journal of Women's Health

JF - International Journal of Women's Health

SN - 1179-1411

IS - 4

ER -