Higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet is inversely associated with mortality in a UK population of cancer survivors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Significant advancements in treatment and care, as well as early detection, have contributed to an increase in cancer survival rates. Recently, the EAT-Lancet Commission on Food, Planet, Health proposed the “planetary health diet” but to date, no study has investigated the potential associations between adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet and mortality in cancer survivors. To determine whether higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet is associated with lower risk for all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality in cancer survivors.

Methods
Data from the prospective UK Biobank study were used. Information from UK Biobank’s Touchscreen questionnaire was used to develop a score reflecting adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association of the EAT-Lancet reference diet score with all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality in cancer survivors.

Results
Within 25,348 cancer survivors, better adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet was inversely related to all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.95–0.99), 1 unit increase) and cancer mortality (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96–1.00), while mostly null associations were observed for major cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95–1.03).

Conclusions
Our findings suggest the adoption of the EAT-Lancet reference diet is associated with lower all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among cancer survivors.
Original languageEnglish
Article number286
JournalBMC Medicine
Volume23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 May 2025

Keywords

  • EAT-Lancet reference diet
  • mortality
  • UK population
  • cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet is inversely associated with mortality in a UK population of cancer survivors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this