How and when high-involvement work practices influence employee innovative behavior

Zhining Wang, Tao Cui, Shaohan Cai, Shuang Ren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
Based on social information processing (SIP) theory, this study explores the cross-level effect of high-involvement work practices (HIWPs) on employee innovative behavior by studying the mediating role of self-reflection/rumination and the moderating role of transactive memory system (TMS).

Design/methodology/approach
This study collects data from 452 employees and their direct supervisors in 94 work units, and tests a cross-level moderated mediation model using multilevel path analysis.

Findings
The results suggest that HIWPs significantly contribute to employee innovative behavior. Both self-reflection and self-rumination mediate the above relationship. TMS not only positively moderates the relationship between HIWPs and self-reflection, but also reinforces the linkage of HIWPs. →self-reflection→employee innovative behavior. Furthermore, TMS negatively moderates the relationship between HIWPs and self-rumination, and attenuates the mediating effect of self-rumination.

Practical implications
The study suggests that enterprises should invest more in promoting HIWPs and TMS in the workplace. Furthermore, managers should provide employees training programs to enhance their self-reflection, as well as lower self-rumination, in order to facilitate employee innovative behavior.

Originality/value
This research identifies self-reflection and self-rumination as key mediators that link HIWPs to employee innovative behavior and reveals the moderating role of TMS in the process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1221-1238
JournalInternational Journal of Manpower
Volume43
Issue number5
Early online date21 Jan 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Aug 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How and when high-involvement work practices influence employee innovative behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this