How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes from an Extended Adversarial Collaboration

Nelson Cowan, Clement Belletier, Jason M Doherty, Agnieszka Jaroslawska, Stephen Rhodes, Alicia Forsberg, Moshe Naveh-Benjamin, Pierre Barrouillet, Valerie Camos, Robert H Logie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There are few examples of an extended adversarial collaboration, in which investigators committed to different theoretical views collaborate to test opposing predictions. Whereas previous adversarial collaborations have produced single research articles, here we share our experience in programmatic, extended adversarial collaboration involving three laboratories in different countries with different theoretical views regarding working memory, the limited information retained in mind, serving ongoing thought and action. We have focused on short- term memory retention of items (letters) during a distracting task (arithmetic), and effects of aging on these tasks. Over several years, we have conducted and published joint research with preregistered predictions, methods, and analysis plans, with replication of each study across two laboratories concurrently. We argue that, although an adversarial collaboration will not usually induce senior researchers to abandon favored theoretical views and adopt opposing views, it will necessitate varieties of their views that are more similar to one another, in that they must account for a growing, common corpus of evidence. This approach promotes understanding of others’ views and presents to the field research findings accepted as valid by researchers with opposing interpretations. We illustrate this process with our own research experiences and make recommendations applicable to diverse scientific areas.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Publication statusAccepted - 03 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Short-Term Memory
Research
Retention (Psychology)

Keywords

  • adversarial collaboration
  • working memory

Cite this

Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., ... Logie, R. H. (Accepted/In press). How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes from an Extended Adversarial Collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
Cowan, Nelson ; Belletier, Clement ; Doherty, Jason M ; Jaroslawska, Agnieszka ; Rhodes, Stephen ; Forsberg, Alicia ; Naveh-Benjamin, Moshe ; Barrouillet, Pierre ; Camos, Valerie ; Logie, Robert H. / How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes from an Extended Adversarial Collaboration. In: Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2020.
@article{65a9e6a6a3404bdc9356b84004d40010,
title = "How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes from an Extended Adversarial Collaboration",
abstract = "There are few examples of an extended adversarial collaboration, in which investigators committed to different theoretical views collaborate to test opposing predictions. Whereas previous adversarial collaborations have produced single research articles, here we share our experience in programmatic, extended adversarial collaboration involving three laboratories in different countries with different theoretical views regarding working memory, the limited information retained in mind, serving ongoing thought and action. We have focused on short- term memory retention of items (letters) during a distracting task (arithmetic), and effects of aging on these tasks. Over several years, we have conducted and published joint research with preregistered predictions, methods, and analysis plans, with replication of each study across two laboratories concurrently. We argue that, although an adversarial collaboration will not usually induce senior researchers to abandon favored theoretical views and adopt opposing views, it will necessitate varieties of their views that are more similar to one another, in that they must account for a growing, common corpus of evidence. This approach promotes understanding of others’ views and presents to the field research findings accepted as valid by researchers with opposing interpretations. We illustrate this process with our own research experiences and make recommendations applicable to diverse scientific areas.",
keywords = "adversarial collaboration, working memory",
author = "Nelson Cowan and Clement Belletier and Doherty, {Jason M} and Agnieszka Jaroslawska and Stephen Rhodes and Alicia Forsberg and Moshe Naveh-Benjamin and Pierre Barrouillet and Valerie Camos and Logie, {Robert H}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "3",
language = "English",
journal = "Perspectives on Psychological Science",
issn = "1745-6916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Cowan, N, Belletier, C, Doherty, JM, Jaroslawska, A, Rhodes, S, Forsberg, A, Naveh-Benjamin, M, Barrouillet, P, Camos, V & Logie, RH 2020, 'How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes from an Extended Adversarial Collaboration', Perspectives on Psychological Science.

How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes from an Extended Adversarial Collaboration. / Cowan, Nelson; Belletier, Clement; Doherty, Jason M; Jaroslawska, Agnieszka; Rhodes, Stephen; Forsberg, Alicia; Naveh-Benjamin, Moshe; Barrouillet, Pierre; Camos, Valerie; Logie, Robert H.

In: Perspectives on Psychological Science, 03.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes from an Extended Adversarial Collaboration

AU - Cowan, Nelson

AU - Belletier, Clement

AU - Doherty, Jason M

AU - Jaroslawska, Agnieszka

AU - Rhodes, Stephen

AU - Forsberg, Alicia

AU - Naveh-Benjamin, Moshe

AU - Barrouillet, Pierre

AU - Camos, Valerie

AU - Logie, Robert H

PY - 2020/1/3

Y1 - 2020/1/3

N2 - There are few examples of an extended adversarial collaboration, in which investigators committed to different theoretical views collaborate to test opposing predictions. Whereas previous adversarial collaborations have produced single research articles, here we share our experience in programmatic, extended adversarial collaboration involving three laboratories in different countries with different theoretical views regarding working memory, the limited information retained in mind, serving ongoing thought and action. We have focused on short- term memory retention of items (letters) during a distracting task (arithmetic), and effects of aging on these tasks. Over several years, we have conducted and published joint research with preregistered predictions, methods, and analysis plans, with replication of each study across two laboratories concurrently. We argue that, although an adversarial collaboration will not usually induce senior researchers to abandon favored theoretical views and adopt opposing views, it will necessitate varieties of their views that are more similar to one another, in that they must account for a growing, common corpus of evidence. This approach promotes understanding of others’ views and presents to the field research findings accepted as valid by researchers with opposing interpretations. We illustrate this process with our own research experiences and make recommendations applicable to diverse scientific areas.

AB - There are few examples of an extended adversarial collaboration, in which investigators committed to different theoretical views collaborate to test opposing predictions. Whereas previous adversarial collaborations have produced single research articles, here we share our experience in programmatic, extended adversarial collaboration involving three laboratories in different countries with different theoretical views regarding working memory, the limited information retained in mind, serving ongoing thought and action. We have focused on short- term memory retention of items (letters) during a distracting task (arithmetic), and effects of aging on these tasks. Over several years, we have conducted and published joint research with preregistered predictions, methods, and analysis plans, with replication of each study across two laboratories concurrently. We argue that, although an adversarial collaboration will not usually induce senior researchers to abandon favored theoretical views and adopt opposing views, it will necessitate varieties of their views that are more similar to one another, in that they must account for a growing, common corpus of evidence. This approach promotes understanding of others’ views and presents to the field research findings accepted as valid by researchers with opposing interpretations. We illustrate this process with our own research experiences and make recommendations applicable to diverse scientific areas.

KW - adversarial collaboration

KW - working memory

M3 - Article

JO - Perspectives on Psychological Science

JF - Perspectives on Psychological Science

SN - 1745-6916

ER -