How Does International Law Condition Responses to Conflict and Negotiation?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article explores the role law plays in defining conflict and its consequences. Two elements of law's categorisations are critical; first law's cataloguing of activities fixing actions into particular classifications and second law's choosing of temporal points from which to analyse conflict, looking both forward and backward at events. The article uses two case studies to demonstrate these two features; Rwanda and Ukraine. Both examples, one historical the other contemporary, are replete with examples of law's categorisations of events and temporal points while demonstrating the tremendous impact that these choices have upon our understanding of how negotiations ought to proceed. This article does not call for a withdrawal of law from these situations but rather cognisance that heavy reliance on law can serve to mask both events and actors critical to successful negotiation and parties must bare this in mind when dealing with conflict.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)272-277
JournalGlobal Policy
Volume7
Issue number2
Early online date28 Apr 2016
Publication statusPublished - May 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How Does International Law Condition Responses to Conflict and Negotiation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this