How many bad apples are in a bunch? An experimental investigation of perceived pesticide residue risks

Simone Cerroni, Sandra Notaro, W. Douglass Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
259 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Subjective risks of having contaminated apples elicited via the Exchangeability Method (EM) are examined in this study. In particular, as the experimental design allows us to investigate the validity of elicited risk measures, we examine the magnitude of differences between valid and invalid observations. In addition, using an econometric model, we also explore the effect of consumers’ socioeconomic status and attitudes toward food safety on subjects’ perceptions of pesticide residues in apples. Results suggest first, that consumers do not expect an increase in the number of apples containing only one pesticide residue, but, rather, in the number of those apples with traces of multiple residues. Second, we find that valid subjective risk measures do not significantly diverge from invalid ones, indicative of little effect of internal validity on the actual magnitude of subjective risks. Finally, we show that subjective risks depend on age, education, a subject’s ties to the apple industry, and consumer association membership.
Original languageEnglish
Article number41
Pages (from-to)112-123
JournalFood Policy
Volume41
Early online date05 Jun 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013

Keywords

  • subjective risks
  • internal validity
  • Pesticide Residues
  • apples

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How many bad apples are in a bunch? An experimental investigation of perceived pesticide residue risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this