How Organizations Engage with External Complexity: A Political Action Perspective

John Child, Suzana B. Rodrigues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper offers a new insight into how organizations engage with external complexity. It applies a political action perspective that draws attention to the hitherto neglected question of how the relative power organizational leaders enjoy within their environments is significant for the actions they can take on behalf of their organizations when faced with external complexity. It identifies cognitive and relational complexity as two dimensions of the environment with which organizations have to engage. It proposes three modes whereby organizations may engage with environmental complexity that are conditioned by an organization's power within its environment. It also considers the intention associated with each mode, as well as the implications of these modes of engagement for how an organization can learn about its environment and for the use of rationality and intuition in its strategic decision-making. The closing discussion considers how this analysis integrates complexity and political action perspectives in a way that contributes to theoretical development and provides the basis for a dynamic political co-evolutionary approach. © The Author(s) 2011.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)803-824
Number of pages22
JournalOrganization Studies
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Decision making
Environmental complexity
Rationality
Strategic decision making
Intuition
Evolutionary

Cite this

Child, John ; Rodrigues, Suzana B. / How Organizations Engage with External Complexity: A Political Action Perspective. In: Organization Studies. 2011 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 803-824.
@article{e832f84a7dc8449e85d57d03bd11813f,
title = "How Organizations Engage with External Complexity: A Political Action Perspective",
abstract = "This paper offers a new insight into how organizations engage with external complexity. It applies a political action perspective that draws attention to the hitherto neglected question of how the relative power organizational leaders enjoy within their environments is significant for the actions they can take on behalf of their organizations when faced with external complexity. It identifies cognitive and relational complexity as two dimensions of the environment with which organizations have to engage. It proposes three modes whereby organizations may engage with environmental complexity that are conditioned by an organization's power within its environment. It also considers the intention associated with each mode, as well as the implications of these modes of engagement for how an organization can learn about its environment and for the use of rationality and intuition in its strategic decision-making. The closing discussion considers how this analysis integrates complexity and political action perspectives in a way that contributes to theoretical development and provides the basis for a dynamic political co-evolutionary approach. {\circledC} The Author(s) 2011.",
author = "John Child and Rodrigues, {Suzana B.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0170840611410825",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "803--824",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

How Organizations Engage with External Complexity: A Political Action Perspective. / Child, John; Rodrigues, Suzana B.

In: Organization Studies, Vol. 32, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 803-824.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Organizations Engage with External Complexity: A Political Action Perspective

AU - Child, John

AU - Rodrigues, Suzana B.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - This paper offers a new insight into how organizations engage with external complexity. It applies a political action perspective that draws attention to the hitherto neglected question of how the relative power organizational leaders enjoy within their environments is significant for the actions they can take on behalf of their organizations when faced with external complexity. It identifies cognitive and relational complexity as two dimensions of the environment with which organizations have to engage. It proposes three modes whereby organizations may engage with environmental complexity that are conditioned by an organization's power within its environment. It also considers the intention associated with each mode, as well as the implications of these modes of engagement for how an organization can learn about its environment and for the use of rationality and intuition in its strategic decision-making. The closing discussion considers how this analysis integrates complexity and political action perspectives in a way that contributes to theoretical development and provides the basis for a dynamic political co-evolutionary approach. © The Author(s) 2011.

AB - This paper offers a new insight into how organizations engage with external complexity. It applies a political action perspective that draws attention to the hitherto neglected question of how the relative power organizational leaders enjoy within their environments is significant for the actions they can take on behalf of their organizations when faced with external complexity. It identifies cognitive and relational complexity as two dimensions of the environment with which organizations have to engage. It proposes three modes whereby organizations may engage with environmental complexity that are conditioned by an organization's power within its environment. It also considers the intention associated with each mode, as well as the implications of these modes of engagement for how an organization can learn about its environment and for the use of rationality and intuition in its strategic decision-making. The closing discussion considers how this analysis integrates complexity and political action perspectives in a way that contributes to theoretical development and provides the basis for a dynamic political co-evolutionary approach. © The Author(s) 2011.

U2 - 10.1177/0170840611410825

DO - 10.1177/0170840611410825

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 803

EP - 824

JO - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

IS - 6

ER -