How power-sharing includes and excludes non-dominant communities: Introduction to the special issue

Timofey Agarin*, Allison McCulloch

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

As the introduction to the special issue titled Democratisation in Divided Places: Designing Power-Sharing Institutions for Broad Inclusion, this article situates the themes, issues, and findings of the issue in a broad disciplinary perspective. Drawing from theories of constitutional design, peacebuilding, democratisation, and ethnonational accommodation, the article outlines the trade-offs that power-sharing faces in war-to-peace transitions and the implications for non-dominant groups. We articulate what we see as a central problem with contemporary power-sharing arrangements, a phenomenon we call the ‘exclusion amid inclusion’ dilemma. That is, for power-sharing to create stability and pacify the dominant groups, it must marginalise non-dominant groups. These are groups who were neglected in the original design of power-sharing institutions, who remain on the sidelines of postconflict politics, and who face major institutional constraints on their representation and participation in the power-sharing arrangement. Using ‘exclusion amid inclusion’ as an analytical lens, we explain how the articles included in the special issue highlight how different societies have grappled with the question of facilitating broad inclusion in the design of political power-sharing institutions.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Political Science Review
Early online date24 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

inclusion
community
democratization
exclusion
Group
political power
accommodation
peace
participation
politics
society

Keywords

  • consociationalism
  • exclusion
  • exclusion-amid-inclusion
  • inclusion
  • peace-to-democracy
  • power-sharing
  • war-to-peace

Cite this

@article{346dac77bbd6457ba89ad86ceea42862,
title = "How power-sharing includes and excludes non-dominant communities: Introduction to the special issue",
abstract = "As the introduction to the special issue titled Democratisation in Divided Places: Designing Power-Sharing Institutions for Broad Inclusion, this article situates the themes, issues, and findings of the issue in a broad disciplinary perspective. Drawing from theories of constitutional design, peacebuilding, democratisation, and ethnonational accommodation, the article outlines the trade-offs that power-sharing faces in war-to-peace transitions and the implications for non-dominant groups. We articulate what we see as a central problem with contemporary power-sharing arrangements, a phenomenon we call the ‘exclusion amid inclusion’ dilemma. That is, for power-sharing to create stability and pacify the dominant groups, it must marginalise non-dominant groups. These are groups who were neglected in the original design of power-sharing institutions, who remain on the sidelines of postconflict politics, and who face major institutional constraints on their representation and participation in the power-sharing arrangement. Using ‘exclusion amid inclusion’ as an analytical lens, we explain how the articles included in the special issue highlight how different societies have grappled with the question of facilitating broad inclusion in the design of political power-sharing institutions.",
keywords = "consociationalism, exclusion, exclusion-amid-inclusion, inclusion, peace-to-democracy, power-sharing, war-to-peace",
author = "Timofey Agarin and Allison McCulloch",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0192512119873075",
language = "English",
journal = "International Political Science Review",
issn = "0192-5121",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How power-sharing includes and excludes non-dominant communities: Introduction to the special issue

AU - Agarin, Timofey

AU - McCulloch, Allison

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - As the introduction to the special issue titled Democratisation in Divided Places: Designing Power-Sharing Institutions for Broad Inclusion, this article situates the themes, issues, and findings of the issue in a broad disciplinary perspective. Drawing from theories of constitutional design, peacebuilding, democratisation, and ethnonational accommodation, the article outlines the trade-offs that power-sharing faces in war-to-peace transitions and the implications for non-dominant groups. We articulate what we see as a central problem with contemporary power-sharing arrangements, a phenomenon we call the ‘exclusion amid inclusion’ dilemma. That is, for power-sharing to create stability and pacify the dominant groups, it must marginalise non-dominant groups. These are groups who were neglected in the original design of power-sharing institutions, who remain on the sidelines of postconflict politics, and who face major institutional constraints on their representation and participation in the power-sharing arrangement. Using ‘exclusion amid inclusion’ as an analytical lens, we explain how the articles included in the special issue highlight how different societies have grappled with the question of facilitating broad inclusion in the design of political power-sharing institutions.

AB - As the introduction to the special issue titled Democratisation in Divided Places: Designing Power-Sharing Institutions for Broad Inclusion, this article situates the themes, issues, and findings of the issue in a broad disciplinary perspective. Drawing from theories of constitutional design, peacebuilding, democratisation, and ethnonational accommodation, the article outlines the trade-offs that power-sharing faces in war-to-peace transitions and the implications for non-dominant groups. We articulate what we see as a central problem with contemporary power-sharing arrangements, a phenomenon we call the ‘exclusion amid inclusion’ dilemma. That is, for power-sharing to create stability and pacify the dominant groups, it must marginalise non-dominant groups. These are groups who were neglected in the original design of power-sharing institutions, who remain on the sidelines of postconflict politics, and who face major institutional constraints on their representation and participation in the power-sharing arrangement. Using ‘exclusion amid inclusion’ as an analytical lens, we explain how the articles included in the special issue highlight how different societies have grappled with the question of facilitating broad inclusion in the design of political power-sharing institutions.

KW - consociationalism

KW - exclusion

KW - exclusion-amid-inclusion

KW - inclusion

KW - peace-to-democracy

KW - power-sharing

KW - war-to-peace

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074472181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0192512119873075

DO - 10.1177/0192512119873075

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074472181

JO - International Political Science Review

JF - International Political Science Review

SN - 0192-5121

ER -