How Structural Model Variability Influences Transonic Aeroelastic Stability

S. Marques, K. J. Badcock, H. H. Khodaparast, J. E. Mottershead

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper considers the ways in which structural model parameter variability can influence aeroelastic stability. Previous work on formulating the stability calculation (with the Euler equations providing the aerodynamic predictions) is exploited to use Monte Carlo, interval, and perturbation calculations to allow this question to be investigated. Three routes are identified. The first involves variable normal-mode frequencies only. The second involves normal-mode frequencies and shapes. Finally, the third, in addition to normal-mode frequencies and shapes, also includes their influence on the static equilibrium. Previous work has suggested only considering the first route, which allows significant gains in computational efficiency if reduced-order models can be built for the aerodynamics. However, results in the current paper show that neglecting the mode-shape variation can give misleading results for the flutter-onset prediction, complicating the development of reduced aerodynamic models for variability analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1189-1199
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Aircraft
Volume49
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aerodynamics
Euler equations
Computational efficiency

Keywords

  • Flutter, Uncertainty, CFD

Cite this

Marques, S., Badcock, K. J., Khodaparast, H. H., & Mottershead, J. E. (2012). How Structural Model Variability Influences Transonic Aeroelastic Stability. Journal of Aircraft, 49(5), 1189-1199. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031103
Marques, S. ; Badcock, K. J. ; Khodaparast, H. H. ; Mottershead, J. E. / How Structural Model Variability Influences Transonic Aeroelastic Stability. In: Journal of Aircraft. 2012 ; Vol. 49, No. 5. pp. 1189-1199.
@article{36108de63a314a90a742180877c4d0dc,
title = "How Structural Model Variability Influences Transonic Aeroelastic Stability",
abstract = "This paper considers the ways in which structural model parameter variability can influence aeroelastic stability. Previous work on formulating the stability calculation (with the Euler equations providing the aerodynamic predictions) is exploited to use Monte Carlo, interval, and perturbation calculations to allow this question to be investigated. Three routes are identified. The first involves variable normal-mode frequencies only. The second involves normal-mode frequencies and shapes. Finally, the third, in addition to normal-mode frequencies and shapes, also includes their influence on the static equilibrium. Previous work has suggested only considering the first route, which allows significant gains in computational efficiency if reduced-order models can be built for the aerodynamics. However, results in the current paper show that neglecting the mode-shape variation can give misleading results for the flutter-onset prediction, complicating the development of reduced aerodynamic models for variability analysis.",
keywords = "Flutter, Uncertainty, CFD",
author = "S. Marques and Badcock, {K. J.} and Khodaparast, {H. H.} and Mottershead, {J. E.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.2514/1.C031103",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1189--1199",
journal = "Journal of Aircraft",
issn = "0021-8669",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)",
number = "5",

}

Marques, S, Badcock, KJ, Khodaparast, HH & Mottershead, JE 2012, 'How Structural Model Variability Influences Transonic Aeroelastic Stability', Journal of Aircraft, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1189-1199. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031103

How Structural Model Variability Influences Transonic Aeroelastic Stability. / Marques, S.; Badcock, K. J.; Khodaparast, H. H.; Mottershead, J. E.

In: Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 49, No. 5, 09.2012, p. 1189-1199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Structural Model Variability Influences Transonic Aeroelastic Stability

AU - Marques, S.

AU - Badcock, K. J.

AU - Khodaparast, H. H.

AU - Mottershead, J. E.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - This paper considers the ways in which structural model parameter variability can influence aeroelastic stability. Previous work on formulating the stability calculation (with the Euler equations providing the aerodynamic predictions) is exploited to use Monte Carlo, interval, and perturbation calculations to allow this question to be investigated. Three routes are identified. The first involves variable normal-mode frequencies only. The second involves normal-mode frequencies and shapes. Finally, the third, in addition to normal-mode frequencies and shapes, also includes their influence on the static equilibrium. Previous work has suggested only considering the first route, which allows significant gains in computational efficiency if reduced-order models can be built for the aerodynamics. However, results in the current paper show that neglecting the mode-shape variation can give misleading results for the flutter-onset prediction, complicating the development of reduced aerodynamic models for variability analysis.

AB - This paper considers the ways in which structural model parameter variability can influence aeroelastic stability. Previous work on formulating the stability calculation (with the Euler equations providing the aerodynamic predictions) is exploited to use Monte Carlo, interval, and perturbation calculations to allow this question to be investigated. Three routes are identified. The first involves variable normal-mode frequencies only. The second involves normal-mode frequencies and shapes. Finally, the third, in addition to normal-mode frequencies and shapes, also includes their influence on the static equilibrium. Previous work has suggested only considering the first route, which allows significant gains in computational efficiency if reduced-order models can be built for the aerodynamics. However, results in the current paper show that neglecting the mode-shape variation can give misleading results for the flutter-onset prediction, complicating the development of reduced aerodynamic models for variability analysis.

KW - Flutter, Uncertainty, CFD

U2 - 10.2514/1.C031103

DO - 10.2514/1.C031103

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 1189

EP - 1199

JO - Journal of Aircraft

JF - Journal of Aircraft

SN - 0021-8669

IS - 5

ER -