How to (re)build human rights consciousness and behavior in postconflict societies: An integrative literature review and framework for past and future research

B. Leidner*, M. Li

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The international community has developed multiple approaches to address large-scale human rights (HR) violations (e.g., genocide). In the current contribution, we first provide a review of different approaches to intergroup violence (AIVs), and explain how these approaches might (re-)establish HR consciousness and behavior in postconflict societies. We then integrate this literature with the HR literature and propose a framework to guide future research on the psychological underpinnings of different AIVs and their effects on HR. Informed by HR research, we argue for a multidimensional conception of HR consciousness (encompassing HR knowledge, endorsement, commitment, and restriction) and a distinction of internalized HR behavior versus HR compliance. These outcomes should be affected by an AIV through appraisals of the AIV (e.g., perceived fairness) and subsequent perceptions of ingroup and outgroup norms, perceptions of the outgroup, and emotions (e.g., anger). Further, appraisals should be affected largely by people’s group memberships and preexisting belief and attitudinal systems. Rather than providing an overall research program with a coherent and specific set of hypotheses, we provide a conceptual framework that clarifies what, according to AIV and HR literature, future research should focus on, and that can help to systematically take stock of past research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)106-132
JournalPeace and Conflict
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Feb 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to (re)build human rights consciousness and behavior in postconflict societies: An integrative literature review and framework for past and future research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this