Impact of Variable RNA-Sequencing Depth on Gene Expression Signatures and Target Compound Robustness: Case Study Examining Brain Tumor (Glioma) Disease Progression

Alexey Stupnikov, Paul G. O’Reilly, Caitriona McInerney, Aideen Roddy, Philip Dunne, Alan Gilmore, Hayley P. Ellis, Thomas Flannery, Estelle Healy, Stuart McIntosh, Kienan Savage, Kathreena M. Kurian, Frank Emmert-Streib, Kevin Prise, Manuel Salto-Tellez, Darragh McArt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
320 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose
Gene expression profiling can uncover biologic mechanisms underlying disease and is important in drug development. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is routinely used to assess gene expression, but costs remain high. Sample multiplexing reduces RNA-seq costs; however, multiplexed samples have lower cDNA sequencing depth, which can hinder accurate differential gene expression detection. The impact of sequencing depth alteration on RNA-seq–based downstream analyses such as gene expression connectivity mapping is not known, where this method is used to identify potential therapeutic compounds for repurposing.

Methods
In this study, published RNA-seq profiles from patients with brain tumor (glioma) were assembled into two disease progression gene signature contrasts for astrocytoma. Available treatments for glioma have limited effectiveness, rendering this a disease of poor clinical outcome. Gene signatures were subsampled to simulate sequencing alterations and analyzed in connectivity mapping to investigate target compound robustness.

Results
Data loss to gene signatures led to the loss, gain, and consistent identification of significant connections. The most accurate gene signature contrast with consistent patient gene expression profiles was more resilient to data loss and identified robust target compounds. Target compounds lost included candidate compounds of potential clinical utility in glioma (eg, suramin, dasatinib). Lost connections may have been linked to low-abundance genes in the gene signature that closely characterized the disease phenotype. Consistently identified connections may have been related to highly expressed abundant genes that were ever-present in gene signatures, despite data reductions. Potential noise surrounding findings included false-positive connections that were gained as a result of gene signature modification with data loss.

Conclusion
Findings highlight the necessity for gene signature accuracy for connectivity mapping, which should improve the clinical utility of future target compound discoveries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Journal JCO Precision Oncology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Sep 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Variable RNA-Sequencing Depth on Gene Expression Signatures and Target Compound Robustness: Case Study Examining Brain Tumor (Glioma) Disease Progression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this