In pursuit of parrhesia: an investigation into knowledge selection in inquisitorial planning practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing upon interviews with procedural actants from Public Inquiry and Examination in Public fora, I draw upon relevant theoretical frameworks to evaluate modes of discourse in inquisitorial planning practice. In the investigation, which is based primarily upon an empirical study, I focus upon the role of evidence, the selection and handling of multiple knowledges, the behaviour of participants, and the methodology underpinning the process. It is established that such arenas can be effective mechanisms for testing complex evidence; and suggestions are made for improved practice, procedure, and future research. I conclude by raising serious ethical questions concerning participant behaviour, particularly on the part of advocates and especially chartered town planners.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)116-133
Number of pages18
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'In pursuit of parrhesia: an investigation into knowledge selection in inquisitorial planning practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this