Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Increasing frailty is associated with higher prevalence and reduced recognition of delirium in older hospitalised inpatients: results of a multi-centre study

  • Waleed Faheem
  • , Taran Nandra
  • , Sarah Richardson
  • , David Saliu
  • , Daisy Wilson
  • , Thomas A. Jackson
  • , Laura Magill
  • , Lauren McCluskey
  • , Rita Perry
  • , Carly Welch
  • , Daisy Wilson
  • , Claire Copeland
  • , Emma L. Cunningham
  • , Daniel Davis
  • , Jonathan Treml
  • , Thomas Pinkney
  • , Terrence Quinn
  • , Peter Nightingale
  • , Benjamin Jelley
  • , Victoria Gaunt
  • Mary Ni Lochlainn, Kumudhini Giridharan, Mustafa Alsahab, Stephen Makin, Kelli Torsney, Jane Masoli, Lindsay Ronan, Jenni K. Burton, Oliver Todd, Joanne Taylor, Ruth Willott, Natalie Cox, Roisin Healy, Nedaa Haddad, Sharan Ramakrishna, Zahid Subhan, Antonella Mazzoleni, Olga Nynaes, Jodie Crofts, Emily McNicholas, Jonathan Baillie, Sophie J. Irwin, Dominic Kelly, Eleanor Leah, Jenny Evans, Mark A. Bowman, Sinead Quinn, Joseph B. Wilson, Clare Hughes, Emily Moore, Geriatric Medicine Research Collaborative

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

112 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose

Delirium is a neuropsychiatric disorder delineated by an acute change in cognition, attention, and consciousness. It is common, particularly in older adults, but poorly recognised. Frailty is the accumulation of deficits conferring an increased risk of adverse outcomes. We set out to determine how severity of frailty, as measured using the CFS, affected delirium rates, and recognition in hospitalised older people in the United Kingdom.

Methods
Adults over 65 years were included in an observational multi-centre audit across UK hospitals, two prospective rounds, and one retrospective note review. Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), delirium status, and 30-day outcomes were recorded.

Results
The overall prevalence of delirium was 16.3% (483). Patients with delirium were more frail than patients without delirium (median CFS 6 vs 4). The risk of delirium was greater with increasing frailty [OR 2.9 (1.8–4.6) in CFS 4 vs 1–3; OR 12.4 (6.2–24.5) in CFS 8 vs 1–3]. Higher CFS was associated with reduced recognition of delirium (OR of 0.7 (0.3–1.9) in CFS 4 compared to 0.2 (0.1–0.7) in CFS 8). These risks were both independent of age and dementia.

Conclusion
We have demonstrated an incremental increase in risk of delirium with increasing frailty. This has important clinical implications, suggesting that frailty may provide a more nuanced measure of vulnerability to delirium and poor outcomes. However, the most frail patients are least likely to have their delirium diagnosed and there is a significant lack of research into the underlying pathophysiology of both of these common geriatric syndromes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-332
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Geriatric Medicine
Volume14
Issue number2
Early online date25 Jan 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The research was sponsored by the University of Birmingham. This study received support for project delivery and coordination from the Birmingham Surgical Trials Consortium via core funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network West Midlands allocated to help support new research collaboratives. The sponsor was not involved in design, methods, subject recruitment, data collections, analysis, or preparation of the manuscript. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors are not the NIHR, National Health Service, or Department of Health.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Delirium
  • Frailty
  • Mortality
  • Recognition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Increasing frailty is associated with higher prevalence and reduced recognition of delirium in older hospitalised inpatients: results of a multi-centre study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this