Increasing Prevalence of Myopia in Europe and the Impact of Education

Katie M Williams, Geir Bertelsen, Phillippa Cumberland, Christian Wolfram, Virginie J M Verhoeven, Eleftherios Anastasopoulos, Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk, Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, Maja Gran Erke, Ruth Hogg, René Höhn, Pirro Hysi, Anthony P Khawaja, Jean-François Korobelnik, Janina Ried, Johannes R Vingerling, Alain Bron, Jean-François Dartigues, Astrid FletcherAlbert Hofman, Robert W A M Kuijpers, Robert N Luben, Konrad Oxele, Fotis Topouzis, Therese von Hanno, Alireza Mirshahi, Paul J Foster, Cornelia M van Duijn, Norbert Pfeiffer, Cécile Delcourt, Caroline C W Klaver, Jugnoo Rahi, Christopher J Hammond, European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

184 Citations (Scopus)
723 Downloads (Pure)


PURPOSE: To investigate whether myopia is becoming more common across Europe and explore whether increasing education levels, an important environmental risk factor for myopia, might explain any temporal trend.

DESIGN: Meta-analysis of population-based, cross-sectional studies from the European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium.

PARTICIPANTS: The E(3) Consortium is a collaborative network of epidemiological studies of common eye diseases in adults across Europe. Refractive data were available for 61 946 participants from 15 population-based studies performed between 1990 and 2013; participants had a range of median ages from 44 to 78 years.

METHODS: Noncycloplegic refraction, year of birth, and highest educational level achieved were obtained for all participants. Myopia was defined as a mean spherical equivalent ≤-0.75 diopters. A random-effects meta-analysis of age-specific myopia prevalence was performed, with sequential analyses stratified by year of birth and highest level of educational attainment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Variation in age-specific myopia prevalence for differing years of birth and educational level.

RESULTS: There was a significant cohort effect for increasing myopia prevalence across more recent birth decades; age-standardized myopia prevalence increased from 17.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.6-18.1) to 23.5% (95% CI, 23.2-23.7) in those born between 1910 and 1939 compared with 1940 and 1979 (P = 0.03). Education was significantly associated with myopia; for those completing primary, secondary, and higher education, the age-standardized prevalences were 25.4% (CI, 25.0-25.8), 29.1% (CI, 28.8-29.5), and 36.6% (CI, 36.1-37.2), respectively. Although more recent birth cohorts were more educated, this did not fully explain the cohort effect. Compared with the reference risk of participants born in the 1920s with only primary education, higher education or being born in the 1960s doubled the myopia prevalence ratio-2.43 (CI, 1.26-4.17) and 2.62 (CI, 1.31-5.00), respectively-whereas individuals born in the 1960s and completing higher education had approximately 4 times the reference risk: a prevalence ratio of 3.76 (CI, 2.21-6.57).

CONCLUSIONS: Myopia is becoming more common in Europe; although education levels have increased and are associated with myopia, higher education seems to be an additive rather than explanatory factor. Increasing levels of myopia carry significant clinical and economic implications, with more people at risk of the sight-threatening complications associated with high myopia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1489-1497
Number of pages9
Issue number7
Early online date13 May 2015
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Increasing Prevalence of Myopia in Europe and the Impact of Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this