Indigenous rights in Chile: National identity and majority group support for multicultural policies

Samuel Pehrson, Roberto Gonzalez, Rupert Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
365 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We examine support for policies affecting indigenous ethnic minorities in Chile. Specifically, we examine the role of national group definitions that include the largest indigenous group—the Mapuche—in different ways. Based on questionnaire data from nonindigenous Chilean students (N = 338), we empirically distinguish iconic inclusion, whereby the Mapuche are seen as an important part of Chile's history and identity on the one hand, from egalitarian inclusion, which represents the Mapuche as citizens of equal importance to the nonindigenous majority on the other. Both forms of inclusion positively predict support for indigenous rights, independent of participants' political affiliation, strength of national identification, and social distance. A second study (N = 277) replicates this finding whilst controlling for right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, blind patriotism, and constructive patriotism. It also finds iconic inclusion to be predictive of a pro-Mapuche position regarding the unrest over the issue of ancestral land in 2009. We conclude that understanding how national identity affects attitudes about minority rights necessitates appreciating the importance of particular meanings of nationality, and not only the strength of identification.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)667-690
Number of pages24
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Indigenous rights in Chile: National identity and majority group support for multicultural policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this