Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials

S.J. Edwards; Mike Clarke; S. Wordsworth; J. Borrill

doi:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02072.x

Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials

S.J. Edwards, Mike Clarke, S. Wordsworth, J. Borrill

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Randomised controlled trials are the most effective way to differentiate between the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely to have been conducted for all competing interventions.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	841-854
Number of pages	14
Journal	International Journal of Clinical Practice
Volume	63
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02072.x
Publication status	Published - Jun 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Medicine

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02072.x

Cite this

@article{a94028bb402842e0bb86f92e560408e0,

title = "Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials",

abstract = "Randomised controlled trials are the most effective way to differentiate between the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely to have been conducted for all competing interventions.",

author = "S.J. Edwards and Mike Clarke and S. Wordsworth and J. Borrill",

year = "2009",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02072.x",

language = "English",

volume = "63",

pages = "841--854",

journal = "International Journal of Clinical Practice",

issn = "1368-5031",

publisher = "Hindawi Limited",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials

AU - Edwards, S.J.

AU - Clarke, Mike

AU - Wordsworth, S.

AU - Borrill, J.

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Randomised controlled trials are the most effective way to differentiate between the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely to have been conducted for all competing interventions.

AB - Randomised controlled trials are the most effective way to differentiate between the effects of competing interventions. However, head-to-head studies are unlikely to have been conducted for all competing interventions.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02072.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02072.x

M3 - Article

SN - 1368-5031

VL - 63

SP - 841

EP - 854

JO - International Journal of Clinical Practice

JF - International Journal of Clinical Practice

IS - 6

ER -

Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this