Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Industry influence in healthcare harms patients: myth or maxim?

  • James Trayer*
  • , Nicola J. Rowbotham
  • , Robert J. Boyle
  • , Alan R. Smyth
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

82 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Healthcare is a major global industry accounting for a significant proportion of government spending. Drug and medical device manufacturers are publicly traded companies with a responsibility to their shareholders to maximise profits by increasing sales. In order to achieve this, industry exerts influence over every part of healthcare including academic research, medical education, clinical guideline development, physician prescribing and through direct interactions with patients. In contrast, healthcare services seek to provide effective, safe and evidence-based treatments. This article examines interactions with industry across these domains and seeks to identify mutually beneficial relationships and potential conflict leading to patient harms. Case studies are used to illustrate these interactions. There is no single solution for improving healthcare’s relationship with industry, although increased transparency has raised awareness of this issue. We briefly discuss some successful interventions that have been tried at national and regulatory level. While industry influence is widespread in healthcare and this has benefits for shareholders, healthcare practitioners have an ethical obligation to prioritise their patients’ best interests. Industry interactions with healthcare professionals have a valid role in product development and distribution, but industry sponsorship of healthcare education and practice, guideline development or regulatory decision-making can have harmful consequences for patients. Healthcare practitioners need to carefully consider these issues when deciding whether to collaborate with industry.

Original languageEnglish
Article number220010
Number of pages16
JournalBreathe
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jul 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Solutions exist to many of these problems. For example, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) has funded independent trials financed by a 5% tax on industry promotional budgets [81]. In its first 3 years this programme raised EUR 78 million and funded 151 studies. Conditions for approval include full researcher control of the study including design, recruitment and data analysis. There is also mandatory reporting of all results and studies may not form part of the drug approval process. The programme focuses on areas

Publisher Copyright:
© ERS 2022.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Industry influence in healthcare harms patients: myth or maxim?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this