Abstract
Is there evidence that market forces effectively discipline risk management behaviour within Chinese financial institutions? This study analyses information from a comprehensive sample of Chinese banks over the 1998-2008 period. Market discipline is captured through the impact of four sets of factors namely, market concentration, interbank deposits, information disclosure, and ownership structure. We find some evidence of a market disciplining effect in that: (i) higher (lower) levels of market concentration lead banks to operate with a lower (higher) capital buffer; (ii) joint-equity banks that disclose more information to the public maintain larger capital ratios; (iii) full state ownership reduces the sensitivity of changes in a bank's capital buffer to its level of risk;(iv) banks that release more transparent financial information hold more capital against their non-performing loans. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 159-186 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Journal of Financial Services Research |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2010 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- Economics and Econometrics
- Finance