Abstract
Under EU legislation, total arsenic levels in drinking water should not exceed 10 microg l(-1), while in the US this figure is set at 10 microg l(-1) inorganic arsenic. All rice milk samples analysed in a supermarket survey (n = 19) would fail the EU limit with up to 3 times this concentration recorded, while out of the subset that had arsenic species determined (n = 15), 80% had inorganic arsenic levels above 10 microg l(-1), with the remaining 3 samples approaching this value. It is a point for discussion whether rice milk is seen as a water substitute or as a food, there are no EU or US food standards highlighting the disparity between water and food regulations in this respect.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 428-431 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- SEAFOOD
- DIETARY EXPOSURE
- RISK-ASSESSMENT
- SPECIATION