Inquiring into Non-Accidental Child Deaths: Reviewing the Review Process

John Devaney*, Anne Lazenbatt, Lisa Bunting, Lisa Bunting

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


There is significant public and professional interest in the non-accidental death of children where abuse and neglect are suspected of being contributory factors. Systems for reviewing these deaths have been developed in each of the four jurisdictions within the UK. The main aims are to ensure that individuals and professionals are held to account if practice falls below the expected standard, whilst also seeking to strengthen the systems for protecting children through reflecting on what lessons, if any, can be learnt from the death of a child through abuse or neglect. Recently, the benefit of such inquiries and the quality of serious case reviews have come under scrutiny. In this paper, the authors report the findings of a Delphi study that sought to explore how the process of conducting reviews following the death of a child could be improved through seeking the views of experienced professionals responsible for child protection in Northern Ireland. The authors conclude that the system does command professional support, but could be improved through greater attention to process issues and a stronger emphasis on translating learning into action. In common with research looking at other recent practice developments, there is a need to focus on process indicators as a means to ensuring that well intentioned policies are translated into workable and functioning practices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-260
Number of pages19
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Issue number2
Early online date24 May 2010
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Health(social science)


Dive into the research topics of 'Inquiring into Non-Accidental Child Deaths: Reviewing the Review Process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this