Institutional influences on SME exporters under divergent transition paths: Comparative insights from Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan

Dilshod Makhmadshoev*, Kevin Ibeh, Mike Crone

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares the influence of national institutional environments on the internationalisation of SME exporters from two countries, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, which followed divergent paths in the transition process. It contributes in several ways, notably by extending scholarly debate on divergent paths of transition to the IB literature, and enriching the institution-based view of IB with perspectives from the new institutional economics and comparative institutionalism and offering fresh evidence of how formal and informal institutions and the enforcement mechanism interact to create specific incentives and barriers for internationalising SMEs. The study, one of the first to examine SME exporters from the former Soviet Republics of Central Asia, cautions against the tendency to attribute countries in the transitional periphery with homogenous institutional environments. Analysis of case study evidence suggests appreciable differences in the institutional environments facing SME exporters in the comparator countries. More specifically, SME exporters in Tajikistan seem to experience tougher institutional constraints relative to their Kyrgyzstan counterparts, and this divergence in institutional environments appears to affect the internationalisation prospects and competitiveness of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan SME exporters adversely and favourably respectively. The above findings are richly illustrated in the paper, which also discusses implications for theory, managerial and policy decision making and future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1025-1038
JournalInternational Business Review
Volume24
Issue number6
Early online date26 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Tajikistan
Small and medium-sized enterprises
Kyrgyzstan
Exporters
Institutional environment
Internationalization
Competitiveness
Institution-based view
Informal institutions
New institutional economics
Incentives
Institutionalism
Institutional constraints
Formal institutions
Enforcement
Decision making
Transition process
Central Asia
Divergence

Keywords

  • Formal institutions
  • Informal institutions
  • Institutional divergence
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Tajikistan
  • Transition economies

Cite this

@article{9af6e9ea3970429297971b9304b40564,
title = "Institutional influences on SME exporters under divergent transition paths: Comparative insights from Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan",
abstract = "This paper compares the influence of national institutional environments on the internationalisation of SME exporters from two countries, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, which followed divergent paths in the transition process. It contributes in several ways, notably by extending scholarly debate on divergent paths of transition to the IB literature, and enriching the institution-based view of IB with perspectives from the new institutional economics and comparative institutionalism and offering fresh evidence of how formal and informal institutions and the enforcement mechanism interact to create specific incentives and barriers for internationalising SMEs. The study, one of the first to examine SME exporters from the former Soviet Republics of Central Asia, cautions against the tendency to attribute countries in the transitional periphery with homogenous institutional environments. Analysis of case study evidence suggests appreciable differences in the institutional environments facing SME exporters in the comparator countries. More specifically, SME exporters in Tajikistan seem to experience tougher institutional constraints relative to their Kyrgyzstan counterparts, and this divergence in institutional environments appears to affect the internationalisation prospects and competitiveness of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan SME exporters adversely and favourably respectively. The above findings are richly illustrated in the paper, which also discusses implications for theory, managerial and policy decision making and future research.",
keywords = "Formal institutions, Informal institutions, Institutional divergence, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Transition economies",
author = "Dilshod Makhmadshoev and Kevin Ibeh and Mike Crone",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.02.010",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1025--1038",
journal = "International Business Review",
issn = "0969-5931",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

Institutional influences on SME exporters under divergent transition paths: Comparative insights from Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. / Makhmadshoev, Dilshod; Ibeh, Kevin; Crone, Mike.

In: International Business Review, Vol. 24, No. 6, 12.2015, p. 1025-1038.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional influences on SME exporters under divergent transition paths: Comparative insights from Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan

AU - Makhmadshoev, Dilshod

AU - Ibeh, Kevin

AU - Crone, Mike

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - This paper compares the influence of national institutional environments on the internationalisation of SME exporters from two countries, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, which followed divergent paths in the transition process. It contributes in several ways, notably by extending scholarly debate on divergent paths of transition to the IB literature, and enriching the institution-based view of IB with perspectives from the new institutional economics and comparative institutionalism and offering fresh evidence of how formal and informal institutions and the enforcement mechanism interact to create specific incentives and barriers for internationalising SMEs. The study, one of the first to examine SME exporters from the former Soviet Republics of Central Asia, cautions against the tendency to attribute countries in the transitional periphery with homogenous institutional environments. Analysis of case study evidence suggests appreciable differences in the institutional environments facing SME exporters in the comparator countries. More specifically, SME exporters in Tajikistan seem to experience tougher institutional constraints relative to their Kyrgyzstan counterparts, and this divergence in institutional environments appears to affect the internationalisation prospects and competitiveness of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan SME exporters adversely and favourably respectively. The above findings are richly illustrated in the paper, which also discusses implications for theory, managerial and policy decision making and future research.

AB - This paper compares the influence of national institutional environments on the internationalisation of SME exporters from two countries, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, which followed divergent paths in the transition process. It contributes in several ways, notably by extending scholarly debate on divergent paths of transition to the IB literature, and enriching the institution-based view of IB with perspectives from the new institutional economics and comparative institutionalism and offering fresh evidence of how formal and informal institutions and the enforcement mechanism interact to create specific incentives and barriers for internationalising SMEs. The study, one of the first to examine SME exporters from the former Soviet Republics of Central Asia, cautions against the tendency to attribute countries in the transitional periphery with homogenous institutional environments. Analysis of case study evidence suggests appreciable differences in the institutional environments facing SME exporters in the comparator countries. More specifically, SME exporters in Tajikistan seem to experience tougher institutional constraints relative to their Kyrgyzstan counterparts, and this divergence in institutional environments appears to affect the internationalisation prospects and competitiveness of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan SME exporters adversely and favourably respectively. The above findings are richly illustrated in the paper, which also discusses implications for theory, managerial and policy decision making and future research.

KW - Formal institutions

KW - Informal institutions

KW - Institutional divergence

KW - Kyrgyzstan

KW - Tajikistan

KW - Transition economies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943455699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.02.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.02.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84943455699

VL - 24

SP - 1025

EP - 1038

JO - International Business Review

JF - International Business Review

SN - 0969-5931

IS - 6

ER -