Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups

Nils Reimer, Julia C. Becker, Angelika Benz, Oliver Christ, Kristof Dhont, Ulrich Klocke, Sybille Neji, Magdalena Rychlowska, Katharina Schmid, Miles Hewstone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)
93 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Previous research has shown that (a) positive intergroup contact with an advantaged group can discourage collective action among disadvantaged-group members and (b) positive intergroup contact can encourage advantaged-group members to take action on behalf of disadvantaged outgroups. Two studies investigated the effects of negative as well as positive intergroup contact. Study 1 (n = 482) found that negative but not positive contact with heterosexual people was associated with sexual-minority students’ engagement in collective action (via group identification and perceived discrimination). Among heterosexual students, positive and negative contacts were associated with, respectively, more and less LGB (lesbian, gay, bisexual) activism. Study 2 (N = 1,469) found that only negative contact (via perceived discrimination) predicted LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) students’ collective action intentions longitudinally while only positive contact predicted heterosexual/cisgender students’ LGBT activism. Implications for the relationship between intergroup contact, collective action, and social change are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-136
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jan 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this