TY - JOUR
T1 - International patient preferences for physician attire: results from cross-sectional studies in four countries across three continents
AU - Houchens, Nathan
AU - Saint, Sanjay
AU - Petrilli, Christopher
AU - Kuhn, Latoya
AU - Ratz, David
AU - De Lott, Lindsey
AU - Zollinger, Marc
AU - Sax, Hugo
AU - Kamata, Kazuhiro
AU - Kuriyama, Akira
AU - Tokuda, Yasuharu
AU - Fumagalli, Carlo
AU - Virgili, Gianni
AU - Fumagalli, Stefano
AU - Chopra, Vineet
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Objective: The patient–physician relationship impacts patients’ experiences and health outcomes. Physician attire is a form of nonverbal communication that influences this relationship. Prior studies examining attire preferences suffered from heterogeneous measurement and limited context. We thus performed a multicentre, cross-sectional study using a standardised survey instrument to compare patient preferences for physician dress in international settings. Setting: 20 hospitals and healthcare practices in Italy, Japan, Switzerland and the USA. Participants: Convenience sample of 9171 adult patients receiving care in academic hospitals, general medicine clinics, specialty clinics and ophthalmology practices. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The survey was randomised and included photographs of a male or female physician dressed in assorted forms of attire. The primary outcome measure was attire preference, comprised of composite ratings across five domains: how knowledgeable, trustworthy, caring and approachable the physician appeared, and how comfortable the respondent felt. Secondary outcome measures included variation in preferences by country, physician type and respondent characteristics. Results: The highest rated forms of attire differed by country, although each most preferred attire with white coat. Low ratings were conferred on attire extremes (casual and business suit). Preferences were more uniform for certain physician types. For example, among all respondents, scrubs garnered the highest rating for emergency department physicians (44.2%) and surgeons (42.4%). However, attire preferences diverged for primary care and hospital physicians. All types of formal attire were more strongly preferred in the USA than elsewhere. Respondent age influenced preferences in Japan and the USA only. Conclusions: Patients across a myriad of geographies, settings and demographics harbour specific preferences for physician attire. Some preferences are nearly universal, whereas others vary substantially. As a one-size-fits-all dress policy is unlikely to reflect patient desires and expectations, a tailored approach should be sought that attempts to match attire to clinical context.
AB - Objective: The patient–physician relationship impacts patients’ experiences and health outcomes. Physician attire is a form of nonverbal communication that influences this relationship. Prior studies examining attire preferences suffered from heterogeneous measurement and limited context. We thus performed a multicentre, cross-sectional study using a standardised survey instrument to compare patient preferences for physician dress in international settings. Setting: 20 hospitals and healthcare practices in Italy, Japan, Switzerland and the USA. Participants: Convenience sample of 9171 adult patients receiving care in academic hospitals, general medicine clinics, specialty clinics and ophthalmology practices. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The survey was randomised and included photographs of a male or female physician dressed in assorted forms of attire. The primary outcome measure was attire preference, comprised of composite ratings across five domains: how knowledgeable, trustworthy, caring and approachable the physician appeared, and how comfortable the respondent felt. Secondary outcome measures included variation in preferences by country, physician type and respondent characteristics. Results: The highest rated forms of attire differed by country, although each most preferred attire with white coat. Low ratings were conferred on attire extremes (casual and business suit). Preferences were more uniform for certain physician types. For example, among all respondents, scrubs garnered the highest rating for emergency department physicians (44.2%) and surgeons (42.4%). However, attire preferences diverged for primary care and hospital physicians. All types of formal attire were more strongly preferred in the USA than elsewhere. Respondent age influenced preferences in Japan and the USA only. Conclusions: Patients across a myriad of geographies, settings and demographics harbour specific preferences for physician attire. Some preferences are nearly universal, whereas others vary substantially. As a one-size-fits-all dress policy is unlikely to reflect patient desires and expectations, a tailored approach should be sought that attempts to match attire to clinical context.
KW - Patient-centred medicine
KW - 1506
KW - 1722
KW - GENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine)
KW - Health policy
KW - Protocols & guidelines
KW - Physician attire
KW - dress
KW - clothing
KW - uniform
KW - patient preferences
KW - patient-physician relationship
KW - nonverbal communication
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061092
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061092
M3 - Article
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 12
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 10
M1 - e061092
ER -