Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
61 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal dysphagia or swallowing difficulties are common in acute care and critical care, affecting 47% of hospitalised frail elderly, 50% of acute stroke patients and approximately 62% of critically ill patients who have been intubated and mechanically ventilated for prolonged periods. Complications of dysphagia include aspiration leading to chest infection and pneumonia, malnutrition, increased length of hospital stay and re-admission to hospital. To date, most dysphagia interventions in acute care have been tested with acute stroke populations. While intervention studies in critical care have been emerging since 2015, they are limited and so there is much to learn about the type, the delivery and the intensity of treatments in this setting to inform future clinical trials. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the evidence regarding the relationship between dysphagia interventions and clinically important patient outcomes in acute and critical care settings.

METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, CINAHL and clinical trial registries from inception to the present. We will include studies conducted with adults in acute care settings such as acute hospital wards or units or intensive care units and critical care settings. Studies will be restricted to randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing a new dysphagia intervention with usual care or another intervention. The main outcomes that will be collected include length of time taken to return to oral intake, change in incidence of aspiration and pneumonia, nutritional status, length of hospital stay and quality of life. Key intervention components such as delivery, intensity, acceptability, fidelity and adverse events associated with such interventions will be collected to inform future clinical trials. Two independent reviewers will assess articles for eligibility, data extraction and quality appraisal. A meta-analysis will be conducted as appropriate.

DISCUSSION: No systematic review has attempted to summarise the evidence for oropharyngeal dysphagia interventions in acute and critical care. Results of the proposed systematic review will inform practice and the design of future clinical trials.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD 42018116849 (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283
Number of pages8
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this