Abstract
Objectives
To identify studies that delivered an intervention to frail older people to improve medicines optimisation; identify the outcomes reported in these studies; and assess the effectiveness of these interventions on chosen study outcomes.
Method
Eight electronic databases and four trial registries were systematically searched from the date of inception to April 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of interventions to improve medicines optimisation (including administration, adherence, deprescribing, prescribing and/or medication review) in community-dwelling older people (aged ≥65 years) with a frailty diagnosis. Only studies published in English were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted, and quality was assessed using an appropriate risk of bias tool.
Key findings
Searches identified 601 articles; one study met the criteria for inclusion. The single eligible study used a quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test study design to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led, team-based medication review for 54 frail older patients living in primary care. Improvements in the total number of medications and prescribing appropriateness were observed. The study was judged to be at an overall serious risk of bias.
Conclusion
There is a dearth of high-quality evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of medicines optimisation interventions for older people with frailty within primary care. Due to the strong association between patients’ level of frailty and adverse outcomes, it is important that future research focuses on proactive interventions which may be beneficial to this patient population.
To identify studies that delivered an intervention to frail older people to improve medicines optimisation; identify the outcomes reported in these studies; and assess the effectiveness of these interventions on chosen study outcomes.
Method
Eight electronic databases and four trial registries were systematically searched from the date of inception to April 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of interventions to improve medicines optimisation (including administration, adherence, deprescribing, prescribing and/or medication review) in community-dwelling older people (aged ≥65 years) with a frailty diagnosis. Only studies published in English were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted, and quality was assessed using an appropriate risk of bias tool.
Key findings
Searches identified 601 articles; one study met the criteria for inclusion. The single eligible study used a quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test study design to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led, team-based medication review for 54 frail older patients living in primary care. Improvements in the total number of medications and prescribing appropriateness were observed. The study was judged to be at an overall serious risk of bias.
Conclusion
There is a dearth of high-quality evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of medicines optimisation interventions for older people with frailty within primary care. Due to the strong association between patients’ level of frailty and adverse outcomes, it is important that future research focuses on proactive interventions which may be beneficial to this patient population.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 297-304 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | International Journal of Pharmacy Practice |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 09 May 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 09 Aug 2022 |
Keywords
- frailty
- medicines optimisation
- older people
- primary care
- systematic review
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Interventions to improve medicines optimisation in older people with frailty in primary care: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Student theses
-
Medicines optimisation for frail older people in primary care: An exploration of community pharmacists' experiences, knowledge and perspectives
Faulkner, L. (Author), Barry, H. (Supervisor) & Hughes, C. (Supervisor), Dec 2022Student thesis: Doctoral Thesis › Doctor of Philosophy