Investigating parasite dynamics of migratory ungulates for sustaining healthy populations: Application to critically-endangered saiga antelopes Saiga tatarica

Munib Khanyari*, E. J. Milner-Gulland, Rodrigo Oyanedel, Hannah Rose Vineer, Navinder J. Singh, Sarah Robinson, Albert Salemgareyev, Eric R. Morgan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contact between wild and domestic ungulates is increasing across rangelands, enabling disease co-transmission. Disease management is difficult given uncertainties in complex system behavior, limited empirical data, and logistical obstacles to interventions. We studied gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) transmission in a rangeland shared by both livestock and the critically-endangered migratory saiga antelope, Saiga tatarica, in order to model infection dynamics under current and plausible future scenarios of increasing livestock numbers, climate change and anti-helminth treatments. Our model was parameterised for trichostrongylid GIN – a cause of mortality and morbidity in ungulates globally - using data on observed faecal nematode egg output and host numbers and distribution. Results showed that seasonal saiga migration leads to asymmetry in parasite transmission, with the majority of GIN acquired by saigas in their autumn and winter range through prior pasture contamination from livestock. Consequently, reducing parasite burdens in livestock early in the season in these areas could disproportionately reduce cross-transmission to saigas. Early-season GIN suppression in livestock in the saiga's spring and summer range was predicted to have weaker effect on parasite transmission to saigas but reduces infections during the calving period, potentially increasing population health and resilience at this critical time. Optimally timed treatments could offset the effects of increasing livestock numbers on GIN infection pressure, while climate warming had only marginal impacts on GIN transmission under all scenarios. Our findings could support better understanding and mitigation of factors affecting saiga health and rural livelihoods. Our approach is transferable to other systems, particularly those with migratory hosts.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109465
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume266
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work would not have been possible without the tremendous on-the-ground support of various researchers and conservationists working with the Association for the Conservation of Biodiversity of Kazakhstan (ACBK). MK would like to thank the Zutshi-Smith foundation and the National Geographic Society (EC-54710C-19) for supporting his work. Trisha Gupta helped with various figures. NJS was supported by the Beyond Moose programme of the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (Naturvårdsverket). ERM was funded by UK Research and Innovation grant EP/T024356/1 .

Funding Information:
This work would not have been possible without the tremendous on-the-ground support of various researchers and conservationists working with the Association for the Conservation of Biodiversity of Kazakhstan (ACBK). MK would like to thank the Zutshi-Smith foundation and the National Geographic Society (EC-54710C-19) for supporting his work. Trisha Gupta helped with various figures. NJS was supported by the Beyond Moose programme of the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (Naturvårdsverket). ERM was funded by UK Research and Innovation grant EP/T024356/1.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022

Keywords

  • Disease
  • Livestock
  • Parasite
  • Rangeland
  • saiga
  • Transmission
  • Ungulate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating parasite dynamics of migratory ungulates for sustaining healthy populations: Application to critically-endangered saiga antelopes Saiga tatarica'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this