Abstract
Purpose: Not all patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are suitable for concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Local failure rate is high for sequential concurrent CRT. As such, there is a rationale for treatment intensification.
Methods and Materials: Isotoxic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a multicenter feasibility study that combines different intensification strategies including hyperfractionation, acceleration, and dose escalation facilitated by IMRT. Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2, and unsuitable for concurrent CRT were recruited. A minimum of 2 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy was compulsory before starting radiation therapy (RT). Radiation dose was increased until a maximum dose of 79.2 Gy was reached or 1 or more of the organs at risk met predefined constraints. RT was delivered in 1.8-Gy fractions twice daily, and an RT quality assurance program was implemented. The primary objective was the delivery of isotoxic IMRT to a dose >60 Gy equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2 assuming an α/β ratio of 10 Gy for acute reacting tissues).
Results: Thirty-seven patients were recruited from 7 UK centers. Median age was 69.9 years (range, 46-86 years). The male-to-female ratio was 17:18. ECOG PS was 0 to 5 in 14.2% of patients; PS was 1 to 27 in 77.1% of patients; PS was 2 to 3 in 8.6% of patients. Stage IIIA:IIIB ratio was 22:13 (62.9%:37.1%). Of 37 patients, 2 (5.4%) failed to achieve EQD2 > 60 Gy. Median prescribed tumor dose was 77.4 Gy (range, 61.2-79.2 Gy). A maximum dose of 79.2Gy was achieved in 14 patients (37.8%). Grade 3 esophagitis was reported in 2 patients, and no patients developed grade 3 to 4 pneumonitis. There were 3 grade 5 events: acute radiation pneumonitis, bronchopulmonary hemorrhage, and acute lung infection. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 25.4 months (range, 8.0-44.2) months for 11 of 35 survivors. The median survival was 18.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.9-30.6), 2-year overall survival was 33.6% (95% CI, 17.9-50.1), and progression-free survival was 23.9% (95% CI, 11.3-39.1).
Conclusions: Isotoxic IMRT is a well-tolerated and feasible approach to treatment intensification.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1341-1348 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics |
Volume | 109 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 11 Mar 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01 Apr 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research is jointly funded by Cancer Research UK's (CRUK) Clinical Trials Awards and Advisory Committee (CTAAC) & British Lung Foundation (grant reference number C17052/A15702). C.F-F. is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Center.
Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the support of Damian Mullan and Ben Taylor (radiology input), Carl Rowbottom and Gareth Webster (protocol development), Dave Ardron (patient representative), Tsang Yatman/Elizabeth Miles/Romaana Mir (NCRI Radiation therapy Quality Assurance Group), Glenda Laviste (senior clinical trials nurse), Sally Falk (research project manager).
Funding Information:
This research is jointly funded by Cancer Research UK’s (CRUK) Clinical Trials Awards and Advisory Committee (CTAAC) & British Lung Foundation (grant reference number C17052/A15702). C.F-F. is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Center.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
Keywords
- Radiotherapy
- Isotoxic
- Lung cancer
- Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- Dose Escalation
- IMRT
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiation
- Oncology
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
- Cancer Research