Justice as Fairness in Planning Policy-Making

Stephen McKay, Michael Murray, Sean MacIntyre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper considers a moral basis for planning theory and endeavours to establish principles of justice which might be relevant to the regulation of development. Whilst the investigation recognises that there is a need for a deeper understanding of the dynamics of governance, it suggests that many of the inefficiencies, inequities and public disquiet concerns relating to planning centre on a drift from a perception that the system is both fair and just, and that practice needs to be anchored on founding values concerned with redistribution and equality. In this context, John Rawls’ theory of justice is employed as a vehicle to capture moral ideas of equality and liberty within a constitutional democracy and as a basis for scrutinising emerging justice based issues which impact upon planning. Using National Policy Statements as a case study, the paper concludes that, whilst there are serious concerns over current policymaking practices, the principles of justice offer a foundation for practical critique which can help overcome problems of mistrust.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147-162
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Planning Studies
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Justice as Fairness in Planning Policy-Making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this