Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Kingdon's multiple streams approach in new political contexts: Consolidation, configuration, and new findings

  • Daniel D. Shephard
  • , Anne Ellersiek
  • , Johannes Meuer
  • , Christian Rupietta
  • , Ruth Mayne
  • , Paul Cairney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There is a need to conduct more diverse cross-case analyses in the Multiple Streams Approach (MSA) literature which originated in the United States, to show how key concepts, such as a windows-of-opportunity and the role of policy entrepreneurs, manifest in different political contexts. We apply Qualitative Comparative Analysis for a cross-case analysis of a unique dataset representing 20 countries from four continents. This approach allows us to highlight distinct pathways to influencing policies. We identify four configurations for expanding civic spaces and two configurations for changing policies. We identify three findings novel to MSA: there are two distinctive policy entrepreneur roles involving local and international civil society actors; effective entrepreneurship is conditional on strengthening civic voice and creating civic space conducive to advocacy; and, therefore, effective entrepreneurs often must focus on expanding the civic space to discuss policy problems and the technical and political feasibility of policy solutions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)523-543
JournalGovernance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions
Volume34
Issue number2
Early online date30 Jul 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Kingdon's multiple streams approach in new political contexts: Consolidation, configuration, and new findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this