La imprenta de Manuel de Sancha (1781-1784), ¿el hijo díscolo de Antonio de Sancha?

Translated title of the contribution: The printing business of Manuel de Sancha (1781-1784), Antonio de Sancha’s rebellious son?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

78 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The printer Manuel de Sancha (1747-1788), second son of the printer-bookseller Antonio de Sancha (1720-1790) has hitherto failed to receive any critical or bibliographical attention, most probably due to being hidden behind the colossal shadow of the significant entrepreneurial and cultural activity of both his father and his eldest brother Gabriel de Sancha (1746-1820), the most active printer-booksellers during the reigns of Carlos III and Carlos IV. This study examines his limited production as a printer in Madrid during the years 1781-1784, as well as his position in the Sancha entrepreneurial and family dynamics, in which he probably did not fit and from which he tried to escape. At a minor scale, Manuel de Sancha tried to establish himself as an independent printer, but due to bad health and the mediocrity of his production, his efforts were cut short after a few years, and he was obliged to sell all his printing presses and business implements to the Imprenta Real.
Translated title of the contributionThe printing business of Manuel de Sancha (1781-1784), Antonio de Sancha’s rebellious son?
Original languageSpanish
Title of host publicationEl mundo del libro y la cultura editorial en la España del siglo XVIII
EditorsGabriel Sanchez Espinosa, Rodrigo Olay
Place of PublicationGijón
PublisherTrea-Instituto Feijoo de Estudios del Siglo XVIII
Pages69-97
Number of pages28
ISBN (Print)9788419525604
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jul 2022

Keywords

  • Manuel de Sancha
  • Antonio de Sancha
  • Spanish Enlightenment
  • Book trade

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The printing business of Manuel de Sancha (1781-1784), Antonio de Sancha’s rebellious son?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this