Late bloomers and baby boomers: ecological drivers of longevity in squamates and the tuatara

Inon Scharf, Anat Feldman, Maria Novosolov, Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, I Das, Monika Böhm, Peter Uetz, Omar Torres-Carvajal, Aaron Bauer, Uri Roll, Shai Meiri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract
Aim
Longevity is an important life‐history trait, directly linked to the core attributes of fitness (reproduction and survival), yet large‐scale comparative studies quantifying its implications for the ecology and life history of ectotherms are scarce. We tested the allometry of longevity in squamates and the tuatara, and determined how longevity is related to key environmental characteristics and life‐history traits. Predictions based on life‐history theory are expected to hold true for ectotherms, similarly to mammals and birds.

Location
World‐wide.

Methods
We assembled from the literature a dataset of the maximum longevities of more than a thousand squamate species, representing c. 10% of their known species diversity, their phylogenetic relationships and multiple life‐history and ecological variables. Correcting for phylogeny, we modelled the link between squamate longevity and both key life‐history traits, such as body mass and age at first reproduction, and important environmental factors, such as latitude and primary productivity within species distributional ranges.

Results
Large‐bodied species live for longer than small ones, but body size explains far less of the variance in longevity than it does in mammals and birds. Accounting for body size, squamate brood frequency is negatively correlated with longevity, while age at first reproduction is positively correlated with longevity. This points to a continuum of slow‐to‐fast life‐history strategies. Squamates in high latitudes and cold regions live for longer, probably because a shorter season of activity translates to slower development, older age at first reproduction and hence to increased longevity. Individuals live longer in captivity than in the wild. Herbivorous and omnivorous squamates live for longer than carnivorous ones. We postulate that low‐quality nutrition reduces growth rates, promotes a relative decline in reproductive rates and thus prolongs life.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)396–405
JournalGlobal Ecology & Biogeography
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Apr 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Late bloomers and baby boomers: ecological drivers of longevity in squamates and the tuatara'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this