Leave it to the Amateurs: A Career Development Explanation of Political Inexperience among Members of the Canadian Parliament

    Research output: Other contribution

    15 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In many advanced democracies, political scientists have lamented the rise of professional politicians as a challenge to the effective representation of diverse electorates. In contrast, their relative absence from Canadian federal politics gives rise to concerns over high levels of political amateurism among Canadian MPs. This study, thus, seeks to account for the numerical weakness of individuals with an occupational background in politics in the Canadian Parliament. It utilizes both individual-level quantitative data on MPs serving between the 35th and 41st Parliaments, inclusive, as well as material from qualitative interviews with over seventy former MPs. Conceptualizing the field of politics as a career in itself, and drawing on career development theory, the study finds that at the key stages of establishing, maintaining, and disengaging from a federal political career, there are specific challenges that are not significantly ameliorated by the possession of professional experience in politics itself. Professional politicians, therefore, have no major advantage over those with non-political occupational backgrounds in their career development. Furthermore, by acknowledging the existence of different types of professional politician, it finds that those whose primary occupational background was in politics itself to be in a distinct minority, but the extent of political amateurism is challenged by a much larger minority of MPs whose primary occupation was non-political but who still possess some secondary or electoral experience prior to entering Parliament.
    Original languageEnglish
    TypeMaster Dissertation
    Publication statusPublished - 24 Aug 2015

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Leave it to the Amateurs: A Career Development Explanation of Political Inexperience among Members of the Canadian Parliament'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this