Abstract
This paper is a case study of the impact of CO2 emissions target setting. We empirically investigate the targets set during the Kyoto Protocol period using a convex nonparametric least squares system, quantile regressions, and a comprehensive data set of 125 countries. Our findings reveal CO2 marginal abatement costs, which: (1) are significantly higher for target setting countries; (2) increase over the sample period; (3) and are an order of magnitude greater than the prevailing emissions pricing mechanisms. The results provide insights into the consequences of policies to curb unwanted by-products in a regulated system and shed light on the price efficiency of carbon markets. Furthermore, we contribute to the debate on emission reduction standard-setting and highlight the importance of shadow price estimates when regulating market instabilities in an emission trading scheme.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 106338 |
| Journal | Energy Economics |
| Volume | 118 |
| Early online date | 01 Nov 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Carbon emissions target setting
- Climate finance
- Convex quantile regression
- Development economics
- Environmental efficiency
- Kyoto protocol
- Marginal abatement costs
- Sustainable finance
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
- General Energy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Lurking in the shadows: The impact of CO2 emissions target setting on carbon pricing in the Kyoto agreement period'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Activities
- 1 KTP & Consultancy in kind
-
RegTech Brainstorm with Alan
Quinn, B. (Advisor)
22 Nov 2022Activity: Consultancy types › KTP & Consultancy in kind
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver