Making sense of climate change in central government annual reports and accounts: a comparative case study between the United Kingdom and Norway

Victoria C. Edgar, Elaine Stewart*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Taking a sensemaking and accountability perspective, this paper explores how the Norwegian and the United Kingdom (UK) central governments understand climate change in the annual reports and accounts and how this shapes its accountability. Using a thematic analysis, we find that the Norwegian central government makes sense of climate change as a global problem requiring coordinated actions with shared responsibility and accountability to international agreements. In contrast, the UK central government understands climate change as a problem for individual departments and accountability to national guidelines. Sensemaking is enabled primarily in the narratives but also visually in the UK central government. Our research contributes to climate-related and accounting research by illustrating how central government understands climate change. Theoretically, we extend the literature on sensemaking to the public sector and how sensemaking shapes accountability for climate change.

Original languageEnglish
JournalFinancial Accountability & Management
Early online date17 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 17 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • central government
  • annual reports and accounts
  • climate change
  • sensemaking
  • accountability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making sense of climate change in central government annual reports and accounts: a comparative case study between the United Kingdom and Norway'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this