Mapping the Public –Private Law Divide: A hybrid approach to corporate accountability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
549 Downloads (Pure)


Images of oil-covered seabirds or radioactive fallout from nuclear disasters easily evoke concerns over the risks to personal integrity and environmental degradation. The energy-extraction industry, like others, is profit-driven – a competitive enterprise, with little regard for the social impact of its activities beyond corporate social responsibility (CSR) rhetoric. CSR is neither a precautionary measure nor a remedial framework. Outsider stakeholder influence from government is limited and CSR is written on companies’ terms. What emerges is a distortion between companies’ responsibility and accountability for breaches. We propose a hybrid form of accountability that incorporates public international law to ensure the state, as a guardian of society, plays a more definitive role. This will require more binding obligations on states and companies beyond the current soft-law principles, to curtail jurisdictional constraints and forum shopping of large corporations, through an international court of reparations to guarantee effective remedies for victims.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)312-336
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Law in Context
Issue number3
Early online date21 Jul 2016
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'Mapping the Public –Private Law Divide: A hybrid approach to corporate accountability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this