Meat thermometer usage amongst European and North American consumers: A scoping review

Sarah Elshahat*, Jayne V. Woodside, Michelle C. McKinley

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Improper cooking of meat contributes to many foodborne illnesses worldwide. The use of meat thermometers during cooking is recommended by food safety authorities in North America, but not yet in Europe. This scoping review investigated meat thermometer usage trends, consumers' barriers and facilitators, and usage-enhancing interventions, with the aim of informing potential policy changes as necessary towards enhancing meat thermometers usage. The study revealed that Europe is far behind North America in meat thermometer research and consumer use. The study results highlighted the increased compliance among mid-aged and higher socio-economic consumer groups. A considerable percentage of people do not use a meat thermometer, despite owning one and knowing its importance. Barriers to meat thermometer usage among consumers included: cooking habits, non-practicality, and the influence of society and media, whereas responsibility to dependents and enhancing meat quality were strong facilitators. Intervention studies showed that knowledge gain does not necessarily translate to behavior change, unless consumers' barriers and facilitators are addressed; hence behavioral theory-based interventions were most effective. The review concludes with recommendations for food safety authorities, starting with filling the research gap to understand consumers’ attitudes and behaviors, followed by implementation and scaling-up of evidence-based interventions, associated with cost-effectiveness studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106692
Number of pages12
JournalFood Control
Volume106
Early online date08 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Thermometers
thermometers
Meat
meat
Cooking
cooking
Food Safety
North America
food safety
consumer attitudes
consumer behavior
cost effectiveness
behavior change
Foodborne Diseases
foodborne illness
compliance
meat quality
socioeconomics
Research
Compliance

Keywords

  • Barriers
  • Consumers' attitudes
  • Foodborne illness
  • Intervention
  • Proper cooking

Cite this

@article{7f091fb71acb4eea9dcaa4e99c3a381a,
title = "Meat thermometer usage amongst European and North American consumers: A scoping review",
abstract = "Improper cooking of meat contributes to many foodborne illnesses worldwide. The use of meat thermometers during cooking is recommended by food safety authorities in North America, but not yet in Europe. This scoping review investigated meat thermometer usage trends, consumers' barriers and facilitators, and usage-enhancing interventions, with the aim of informing potential policy changes as necessary towards enhancing meat thermometers usage. The study revealed that Europe is far behind North America in meat thermometer research and consumer use. The study results highlighted the increased compliance among mid-aged and higher socio-economic consumer groups. A considerable percentage of people do not use a meat thermometer, despite owning one and knowing its importance. Barriers to meat thermometer usage among consumers included: cooking habits, non-practicality, and the influence of society and media, whereas responsibility to dependents and enhancing meat quality were strong facilitators. Intervention studies showed that knowledge gain does not necessarily translate to behavior change, unless consumers' barriers and facilitators are addressed; hence behavioral theory-based interventions were most effective. The review concludes with recommendations for food safety authorities, starting with filling the research gap to understand consumers’ attitudes and behaviors, followed by implementation and scaling-up of evidence-based interventions, associated with cost-effectiveness studies.",
keywords = "Barriers, Consumers' attitudes, Foodborne illness, Intervention, Proper cooking",
author = "Sarah Elshahat and Woodside, {Jayne V.} and McKinley, {Michelle C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.018",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
journal = "Food Control",
issn = "0956-7135",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

Meat thermometer usage amongst European and North American consumers: A scoping review. / Elshahat, Sarah; Woodside, Jayne V.; McKinley, Michelle C.

In: Food Control, Vol. 106, 106692, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meat thermometer usage amongst European and North American consumers: A scoping review

AU - Elshahat, Sarah

AU - Woodside, Jayne V.

AU - McKinley, Michelle C.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Improper cooking of meat contributes to many foodborne illnesses worldwide. The use of meat thermometers during cooking is recommended by food safety authorities in North America, but not yet in Europe. This scoping review investigated meat thermometer usage trends, consumers' barriers and facilitators, and usage-enhancing interventions, with the aim of informing potential policy changes as necessary towards enhancing meat thermometers usage. The study revealed that Europe is far behind North America in meat thermometer research and consumer use. The study results highlighted the increased compliance among mid-aged and higher socio-economic consumer groups. A considerable percentage of people do not use a meat thermometer, despite owning one and knowing its importance. Barriers to meat thermometer usage among consumers included: cooking habits, non-practicality, and the influence of society and media, whereas responsibility to dependents and enhancing meat quality were strong facilitators. Intervention studies showed that knowledge gain does not necessarily translate to behavior change, unless consumers' barriers and facilitators are addressed; hence behavioral theory-based interventions were most effective. The review concludes with recommendations for food safety authorities, starting with filling the research gap to understand consumers’ attitudes and behaviors, followed by implementation and scaling-up of evidence-based interventions, associated with cost-effectiveness studies.

AB - Improper cooking of meat contributes to many foodborne illnesses worldwide. The use of meat thermometers during cooking is recommended by food safety authorities in North America, but not yet in Europe. This scoping review investigated meat thermometer usage trends, consumers' barriers and facilitators, and usage-enhancing interventions, with the aim of informing potential policy changes as necessary towards enhancing meat thermometers usage. The study revealed that Europe is far behind North America in meat thermometer research and consumer use. The study results highlighted the increased compliance among mid-aged and higher socio-economic consumer groups. A considerable percentage of people do not use a meat thermometer, despite owning one and knowing its importance. Barriers to meat thermometer usage among consumers included: cooking habits, non-practicality, and the influence of society and media, whereas responsibility to dependents and enhancing meat quality were strong facilitators. Intervention studies showed that knowledge gain does not necessarily translate to behavior change, unless consumers' barriers and facilitators are addressed; hence behavioral theory-based interventions were most effective. The review concludes with recommendations for food safety authorities, starting with filling the research gap to understand consumers’ attitudes and behaviors, followed by implementation and scaling-up of evidence-based interventions, associated with cost-effectiveness studies.

KW - Barriers

KW - Consumers' attitudes

KW - Foodborne illness

KW - Intervention

KW - Proper cooking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067792631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.018

DO - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.018

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85067792631

VL - 106

JO - Food Control

JF - Food Control

SN - 0956-7135

M1 - 106692

ER -