Meta-Theoretical Paradigms Underpinning Risk in Child Welfare: Towards a Position of Methodological Pragmatism

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)
    412 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The aim of this paper is to explore the ‘natural attitude’ underpinning risk practices in child welfare. This refers to various taken-for-granted approaches to risk that social workers and other human service professionals draw upon in their everyday practice. The approach proceeds by identifying and critically examining three key, meta-theoretical paradigms on risk which typically shape the natural attitude. They are labelled ‘objectivist’, ‘subjectivist’ and ‘critical’. The ontological, epistemological, axiological and methodological premises supporting each paradigm, and how they shape risk practices, are then reviewed leading to a composite, meta-theoretical position on risk termed ‘methodological pragmatism’. This position draws on the strengths of each paradigm and is formulated into ten propositions which consider how risk should be approached in child welfare. Within this corpus of thought salient themes are endorsed such as the need for method triangulation, an examination of ‘deep causality’, and the promotion of emancipatory perspectives. By critically reflecting on meta-theory, the paper contributes to the development of substantive theories of risk assessment and management in child welfare.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)55-60
    JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
    Volume47
    Issue number1
    Early online date18 Dec 2013
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Education
    • Developmental and Educational Psychology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Meta-Theoretical Paradigms Underpinning Risk in Child Welfare: Towards a Position of Methodological Pragmatism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this