Misinterpreting carbon accumulation rates in records from near-surface peat

Dylan M. Young*, Andy J. Baird, Dan J. Charman, Chris D. Evans, Angela V. Gallego-Sala, Peter J. Gill, Paul D.M. Hughes, Paul J. Morris, Graeme T. Swindles

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
109 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Peatlands are globally important stores of carbon (C) that contain a record of how their rates of C accumulation have changed over time. Recently, near-surface peat has been used to assess the effect of current land use practices on C accumulation rates in peatlands. However, the notion that accumulation rates in recently formed peat can be compared to those from older, deeper, peat is mistaken – continued decomposition means that the majority of newly added material will not become part of the long-term C store. Palaeoecologists have known for some time that high apparent C accumulation rates in recently formed peat are an artefact and take steps to account for it. Here we show, using a model, how the artefact arises. We also demonstrate that increased C accumulation rates in near-surface peat cannot be used to infer that a peatland as a whole is accumulating more C – in fact the reverse can be true because deep peat can be modified by events hundreds of years after it was formed. Our findings highlight that care is needed when evaluating recent C addition to peatlands especially because these interpretations could be wrongly used to inform land use policy and decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number17939
Number of pages8
JournalScientific Reports
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Nov 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Misinterpreting carbon accumulation rates in records from near-surface peat'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this