Modelling the brightness increase signature due to asteroid collisions

Ev McLoughlin, Alan Fitzsimmons, Alan McLoughlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


We have developed a model to predict the post-collision brightness increase of sub-catastrophic collisions between asteroids and to evaluate the likelihood of a survey detecting these events. It is based on the cratering scaling laws of Holsapple and Housen (2007) and models the ejecta expansion following an impact as occurring in discrete shells each with their own velocity. We estimate the magnitude change between a series of target/impactor pairs, as- suming it is given by the increase in reflecting surface area within a photometric aperture due to the resulting ejecta. As expected the photometric signal increases with impactor size, but we find also that the photometric signature decreases rapidly as the target aster- oid diameter increases, due to gravitational fallback. We have used the model results to make an estimate of the impactor diameter for the (596) Scheila collision of D = 49 − 65m depending on the impactor taxonomy, which is broadly consistent with previous estimates. We varied both the strength regime (highly porous and sand/cohesive soil) and the tax- onomic type (S-, C- and D-type) to examine the effect on the magnitude change, finding that it is significant at early stages but has only a small effect on the overall lifetime of the photometric signal. Combining the results of this model with the collision frequency estimates of Bottke et al. (2005), we find that low-cadence surveys of ∼one visit per luna- tion will be insensitive to impacts on asteroids with D < 20km if relying on photometric detections.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-48
Number of pages12
Early online date17 Apr 2015
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics


Dive into the research topics of 'Modelling the brightness increase signature due to asteroid collisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this