Abstract
Evapotranspiration (ET) is a significant aspect of the hydrologic cycle, notably in irrigated agriculture. Direct approaches for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ET0) are either difficult or need a large number of inputs that are not always available from meteorological stations. Over a 6-year period (2006–2011), this study compares Feed Forward Neural Network (FFNN), Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN), and Gene Expression Programming (GEP) machine learning approaches for estimating daily ET0 in a meteorological station in the Lower Cheliff Plain, northwest Algeria. ET0 was estimated using the FAO-56 Penman–Monteith (FAO56PM) equation and observed meteorological data. The estimated ET0 using FAO56PM was then used as the target output for the machine learning models, while the observed meteorological data were used as the model inputs. Based on the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (EF), the RBFNN and GEP models showed promising performance. However, the FFNN model performed the best during training (R2 = 0.9903, RMSE = 0.2332, and EF = 0.9902) and testing (R2 = 0.9921, RMSE = 0.2342, and EF = 0.9902) phases in forecasting the Penman–Monteith evapotranspiration.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 1210 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Water (Switzerland) |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 09 Apr 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Funding: This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (NRF-2020R1C1C1014636).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Keywords
- Algeria
- ANN
- FAO-56 Penman–Monteith
- GEP
- Lower Cheliff
- reference evapotranspiration
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biochemistry
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Aquatic Science
- Water Science and Technology