Moral Compromise

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A moral compromise is a compromise on moral matters; it is agreement in the face of moral disagreement but where there is agreement on the importance of consensus – namely that it secures a morally desirable outcome. It is distinguishable from other forms of agreement, and an important distinction between moral compromise with public agreement and moral compromise with public disagreement is also made. Circumstances in which the former might be permissible are outlined, and the sense in which it is allowed all things considered to agree is made clear. The relevant discussions of Dan Brock and Mary Warnock on the role of the philosopher to public policy are critically reviewed. Finally, a brief list is offered of the considerations relevant to an estimation of whether and, if so, when such compromise is allowed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)403-420
    Number of pages18
    JournalPhilosophy
    Volume87
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012

      Fingerprint

    Cite this