Multi-tissue transcriptomes of caecilian amphibians highlight incomplete knowledge of vertebrate gene families

María Torres-Sánchez, Christopher J Creevey, Etienne Kornobis, David J Gower, Mark Wilkinson, Diego San Mauro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
341 Downloads (Pure)


RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has become one of the most powerful tools to unravel the genomic basis of biological adaptation and diversity. Although challenging, RNA-seq is particularly promising for research on non-model, secretive species that cannot be observed in nature easily and therefore remain comparatively understudied. Among such animals, the caecilians (order Gymnophiona) likely constitute the least known group of vertebrates, despite being an old and remarkably distinct lineage of amphibians. Here, we characterize multi-tissue transcriptomes for five species of caecilians that represent a broad level of diversity across the order. We identified vertebrate homologous elements of caecilian functional genes of varying tissue specificity that reveal a great number of unclassified gene families, especially for the skin. We annotated several protein domains for those unknown candidate gene families to investigate their function. We also conducted supertree analyses of a phylogenomic dataset of 1,955 candidate orthologous genes among five caecilian species and other major lineages of vertebrates, with the inferred tree being in agreement with current views of vertebrate evolution and systematics. Our study provides insights into the evolution of vertebrate protein-coding genes, and a basis for future research on the molecular elements underlying the particular biology and adaptations of caecilian amphibians.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDNA Research
Publication statusPublished - 22 Oct 2018

Bibliographical note



Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-tissue transcriptomes of caecilian amphibians highlight incomplete knowledge of vertebrate gene families'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this