Multilevel party organizations in a fragmented presidential system: the case of Brazil

Pedro Floriano Ribeiro, Elodie Fabre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The article analyzes the combined impact of hitherto understudied factors in the literature about multilevel parties – presidentialism, party agency, and party system fragmentation – on the vertical integration of party organizations, using Brazil as a case study. We rely on original data on party funding and intra-party interventions, party statutes, and secondary literature to compare the multilevel distribution of powers within the major Brazilian parties. The findings show that state branches receive overall more autonomy to deal with their own regional matters than powers to participate in central party decisions. The differences among parties can be attributed mainly to strategic choices: the parties that usually engage in presidential races grant lower levels of autonomy to their regional branches and face fewer pressures from regional elites. The findings have theoretical and empirical implications beyond the case, as they suggest important connections between multilevel party organizations, institutions, and party strategies.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages31
JournalRegional and Federal Studies
Early online date28 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 28 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

presidential system
party organization
autonomy
party statute
Brazil
vertical integration
distribution of power
party system
fragmentation
elite
funding
literature
decision
distribution

Cite this

@article{19f8627d9f5c4fc89ee963825efc72b6,
title = "Multilevel party organizations in a fragmented presidential system: the case of Brazil",
abstract = "The article analyzes the combined impact of hitherto understudied factors in the literature about multilevel parties – presidentialism, party agency, and party system fragmentation – on the vertical integration of party organizations, using Brazil as a case study. We rely on original data on party funding and intra-party interventions, party statutes, and secondary literature to compare the multilevel distribution of powers within the major Brazilian parties. The findings show that state branches receive overall more autonomy to deal with their own regional matters than powers to participate in central party decisions. The differences among parties can be attributed mainly to strategic choices: the parties that usually engage in presidential races grant lower levels of autonomy to their regional branches and face fewer pressures from regional elites. The findings have theoretical and empirical implications beyond the case, as they suggest important connections between multilevel party organizations, institutions, and party strategies.",
author = "Ribeiro, {Pedro Floriano} and Elodie Fabre",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/13597566.2019.1591375",
language = "English",
journal = "Regional and Federal Studies",
issn = "1359-7566",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Multilevel party organizations in a fragmented presidential system: the case of Brazil. / Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano; Fabre, Elodie.

In: Regional and Federal Studies, 28.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multilevel party organizations in a fragmented presidential system: the case of Brazil

AU - Ribeiro, Pedro Floriano

AU - Fabre, Elodie

PY - 2019/3/28

Y1 - 2019/3/28

N2 - The article analyzes the combined impact of hitherto understudied factors in the literature about multilevel parties – presidentialism, party agency, and party system fragmentation – on the vertical integration of party organizations, using Brazil as a case study. We rely on original data on party funding and intra-party interventions, party statutes, and secondary literature to compare the multilevel distribution of powers within the major Brazilian parties. The findings show that state branches receive overall more autonomy to deal with their own regional matters than powers to participate in central party decisions. The differences among parties can be attributed mainly to strategic choices: the parties that usually engage in presidential races grant lower levels of autonomy to their regional branches and face fewer pressures from regional elites. The findings have theoretical and empirical implications beyond the case, as they suggest important connections between multilevel party organizations, institutions, and party strategies.

AB - The article analyzes the combined impact of hitherto understudied factors in the literature about multilevel parties – presidentialism, party agency, and party system fragmentation – on the vertical integration of party organizations, using Brazil as a case study. We rely on original data on party funding and intra-party interventions, party statutes, and secondary literature to compare the multilevel distribution of powers within the major Brazilian parties. The findings show that state branches receive overall more autonomy to deal with their own regional matters than powers to participate in central party decisions. The differences among parties can be attributed mainly to strategic choices: the parties that usually engage in presidential races grant lower levels of autonomy to their regional branches and face fewer pressures from regional elites. The findings have theoretical and empirical implications beyond the case, as they suggest important connections between multilevel party organizations, institutions, and party strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063566760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13597566.2019.1591375

DO - 10.1080/13597566.2019.1591375

M3 - Article

JO - Regional and Federal Studies

JF - Regional and Federal Studies

SN - 1359-7566

ER -