Narrating Entanglements: Rethinking the Local/Global Divide in Ethnographic Migration Research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
188 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper interrogates the emerging practices of narrative methods in research that focuses on mobility and migration. It seeks to understand how these methods enable a conceptualization of global politics that challenges the global/local divide, revealing instead complex entanglements through which the local and the global are mutually constituted. Focusing in particular on the primacy of narrative, and on the concept of “translation,” the paper argues that participants in research author narratives in ways that reveal alternative, powerful accounts of global politics that are meaning-making and demand an understanding of “local” knowledges as valid and important insights into how global politics is understood. Ultimately, these methods engage the heterogeneous, multiple, and ultimately fully relational narratives of individuals who are autonomous and creative, and the ways these accounts interrupt the dominant narratives of how the world is politically understood—and is politically practiced.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-397
JournalInternational Political Sociology
Volume10
Issue number4
Early online date01 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

migration research
narrative
politics
research focus
migration
demand

Cite this

@article{c47861baaf3b42bf89d586b6ccb103b6,
title = "Narrating Entanglements: Rethinking the Local/Global Divide in Ethnographic Migration Research",
abstract = "This paper interrogates the emerging practices of narrative methods in research that focuses on mobility and migration. It seeks to understand how these methods enable a conceptualization of global politics that challenges the global/local divide, revealing instead complex entanglements through which the local and the global are mutually constituted. Focusing in particular on the primacy of narrative, and on the concept of “translation,” the paper argues that participants in research author narratives in ways that reveal alternative, powerful accounts of global politics that are meaning-making and demand an understanding of “local” knowledges as valid and important insights into how global politics is understood. Ultimately, these methods engage the heterogeneous, multiple, and ultimately fully relational narratives of individuals who are autonomous and creative, and the ways these accounts interrupt the dominant narratives of how the world is politically understood—and is politically practiced.",
author = "Johnson, {Heather L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1093/ips/olw021",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "383--397",
journal = "International Political Sociology",
issn = "1749-5679",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Narrating Entanglements: Rethinking the Local/Global Divide in Ethnographic Migration Research. / Johnson, Heather L.

In: International Political Sociology, Vol. 10, No. 4, 15.01.2017, p. 383-397.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Narrating Entanglements: Rethinking the Local/Global Divide in Ethnographic Migration Research

AU - Johnson, Heather L.

PY - 2017/1/15

Y1 - 2017/1/15

N2 - This paper interrogates the emerging practices of narrative methods in research that focuses on mobility and migration. It seeks to understand how these methods enable a conceptualization of global politics that challenges the global/local divide, revealing instead complex entanglements through which the local and the global are mutually constituted. Focusing in particular on the primacy of narrative, and on the concept of “translation,” the paper argues that participants in research author narratives in ways that reveal alternative, powerful accounts of global politics that are meaning-making and demand an understanding of “local” knowledges as valid and important insights into how global politics is understood. Ultimately, these methods engage the heterogeneous, multiple, and ultimately fully relational narratives of individuals who are autonomous and creative, and the ways these accounts interrupt the dominant narratives of how the world is politically understood—and is politically practiced.

AB - This paper interrogates the emerging practices of narrative methods in research that focuses on mobility and migration. It seeks to understand how these methods enable a conceptualization of global politics that challenges the global/local divide, revealing instead complex entanglements through which the local and the global are mutually constituted. Focusing in particular on the primacy of narrative, and on the concept of “translation,” the paper argues that participants in research author narratives in ways that reveal alternative, powerful accounts of global politics that are meaning-making and demand an understanding of “local” knowledges as valid and important insights into how global politics is understood. Ultimately, these methods engage the heterogeneous, multiple, and ultimately fully relational narratives of individuals who are autonomous and creative, and the ways these accounts interrupt the dominant narratives of how the world is politically understood—and is politically practiced.

U2 - 10.1093/ips/olw021

DO - 10.1093/ips/olw021

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 383

EP - 397

JO - International Political Sociology

JF - International Political Sociology

SN - 1749-5679

IS - 4

ER -