Natural cutaneous anthrax infection, but not vaccination, induces a CD4+ T cell response involving diverse cytokines

Rebecca J. Ingram, Stephanie Ascough, Catherine J. Reynolds, Gokhan Metan , Mehmet Doganay , Les Baillie, Diane E. Williamson, John H. Robinson, Bernard Maillere, Rosemary J. Boyton, Daniel M. Altmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
256 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background

Whilst there have been a number of insights into the subsets of CD4+ T cells induced by pathogenicBacillus anthracis infections in animal models, how these findings relate to responses generated in naturally infected and vaccinated humans has yet to be fully established. We describe the cytokine profile produced in response to T cell stimulation with a previously defined immunodominant antigen of anthrax, lethal factor (LF), domain IV, in cohorts of individuals with a history of cutaneous anthrax, compared with vaccinees receiving the U.K. licenced Anthrax Vaccine Precipitated (AVP) vaccine.

Findings

We found that immunity following natural cutaneous infection was significantly different from that seen after vaccination. AVP vaccination was found to result in a polarized IFNγ CD4+ T cell response, while the individuals exposed to B. anthracis by natural infection mounted a broader cytokine response encompassing IFNγ, IL-5, −9, −10, −13, −17, and −22.

Conclusions

Vaccines seeking to incorporate the robust, long-lasting, CD4 T cell immune responses observed in naturally acquired cutaneous anthrax cases may need to elicit a similarly broad spectrum cellular immune response.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20
Number of pages6
JournalCell & Bioscience
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Natural cutaneous anthrax infection, but not vaccination, induces a CD4+ T cell response involving diverse cytokines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this