Abstract
A central challenge of the Belfast–Good Friday Agreement is the radical contingency or uncertainty that underpins the current democratic legal order in Northern Ireland. It is a dimension of the Agreement that will come to the fore with growing demands for preparations and planning ahead of any referendum on the constitutional future of the region. Using a combination of perspectives from the literature on societal trauma and agonism, this article asks if we need to pay more attention to this affective dimension of the Belfast–Good Friday Agreement and the journey from outright antagonism to an agonism that envisages a society capable of addressing conflict while respecting the ‘other’s’ entitlement to hold a radically different position.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 83-98 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Dec 2020 |
Bibliographical note
This article is situated within the legal, constitutional and political analysis of the Belfast-Good Friday Agreement. The article also references literature on societal trauma and conflict.Keywords
- agonism; complexity; Good Friday Agreement; complexity; emergence; hegemony; the political; politics; Northern Ireland
- trauma; societal trauma
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities
- General Social Sciences
Profiles
-
Peter Doran
- School of Law - Senior Lecturer
- The Senator George J Mitchell Institute for Global Peace, Security and Justice
Person: Academic